News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conve... by memish on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @02:54PM (#33806657)
It's just referencing the fact that the new Twitter is more open and transparent. I can't believe how many people are spinning this as a bad thing.

We heard almost nothing from Parag and little from Jack when he was running it and experiments were opaque from the outside.

Now we're hearing from the CEO and employees like George Hotz about what they are doing and planning, and they're involving the community, asking for feedback directly.

Re:Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conve... by JumpCrisscross on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @02:58PM (#33806707)
> previous Twitter wasn't as transparent as it is now

Reinstating accounts on the basis of a poll, on a platform you have spent months railing for having too many bots, is a good example of CYA transparency.

Re:Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conve... by spamuel on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @03:34PM (#33807233)
Elon specifically mentioned that his polls were actually a great way to obviate bots, as reflected by the bot activity seen on them. He was going to reinstate the accounts anyway.
Re:Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conve... by ilyt on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @05:35PM (#33808926)
That sounds like excuse after the fact someone called him on his bullshit
Re:Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conve... by h3rsko on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @05:38PM (#33808973)
And are all the bots expected to vote one way?
Re:Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conve... by tptacek on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @07:21PM (#33810279)
That's your response? That polling is transparent because both sides will just turn it into a game of CoreWars, and may the best argument win (at CoreWars)?