Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conversation

Re:Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conve... by JumpCrisscross on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @02:58PM (#33806707)

> previous Twitter wasn't as transparent as it is now

Reinstating accounts on the basis of a poll, on a platform you have spent months railing for having too many bots, is a good example of CYA transparency.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conve... by spamuel on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @03:34PM (#33807233)

Elon specifically mentioned that his polls were actually a great way to obviate bots, as reflected by the bot activity seen on them. He was going to reinstate the accounts anyway.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conve... by ilyt on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @05:35PM (#33808926)

That sounds like excuse after the fact someone called him on his bullshit

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conve... by h3rsko on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @05:38PM (#33808973)

And are all the bots expected to vote one way?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter 2.0: Our continued commitment to the public conve... by tptacek on Wednesday November 30, 2022 @07:21PM (#33810279)

That's your response? That polling is transparent because both sides will just turn it into a game of CoreWars, and may the best argument win (at CoreWars)?

[ Parent | on HN ]