Re:Being OK with Not Being Extraordinary
by basicallybones on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @02:41PM
(#33723615)
I have adopted this approach (somewhat out of failure!), and what I have found is this: being significantly above average in a lot of unrelated domains is both far easier than being world-class in a single domain and often can make you even more effective than someone who is a savant in a single domain.
Re:Being OK with Not Being Extraordinary
by j7ake on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @02:26PM
(#33723459)
Perhaps I would add also these distributions are high dimensional. Although being slightly above average is not difficult (unlikely to get paid doing it), if you can find a handful of non correlated features at which you are above average, you can be easily be the top few percent in your sub field (ie likely to be paid handsomely for your expertise)
I’m pretty sure you can be paid handsomely for being an above average accountant or plumber in a decent location (and mid sized or bigger city in the developed world for example)! Being above average at playing the guitar, not so much.
Re:Being OK with Not Being Extraordinary
by d3ckard on Thursday November 24, 2022 @05:17PM
(#33736864)
The point is more that above average multi-instrumentalist can outearn easily better (but single instrument) musicians.
Re:Being OK with Not Being Extraordinary
by marginalien on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @02:27PM
(#33723467)
„being somewhere to the right of the bell curve peak but not too far down. He says this is the sweet spot where you get the most fun and enjoyment“
So true. So, so true.
Re:Being OK with Not Being Extraordinary
by chrisdbanks on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @02:45PM
(#33723656)
Skills don't follow a bell curve or normal distribution. They follow a power law distribution with most people being terrible and a very small number of people being exceptional.
Re:Being OK with Not Being Extraordinary
by lioeters on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @03:09PM
(#33723920)
Today I learned:
> A few notable examples of power laws are Pareto's law of income distribution, structural self-similarity of fractals, and scaling laws in biological systems.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_law#Power-law_functions
An opinionated comparison of the bell-curve and Pareto distribution:
> (1) The power law is often an empirical fact (the way things are) but not necessarily the platonic idea (the way things ought to be); and
> (2) We can tame or mitigate at least some of the negative aspects of the power law by encouraging eclectic and diverse strategies.
Tyranny of the Power Law - http://econophysics.blogspot.com/2006/07/tyranny-of-power-la...
Re:Being OK with Not Being Extraordinary
by nlittlepoole on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @09:16PM
(#33727143)
Thanks for sharing, I enjoyed the "Tyranny of the Power Law".
Re:Being OK with Not Being Extraordinary
by ulnarkressty on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @03:14PM
(#33723982)
Is it really a power law or just that the right half of the bell curve could pass the interview?
Re:Being OK with Not Being Extraordinary
by kridsdale2 on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @03:40PM
(#33724241)
I've never thought about it this way. Cut off the left side of the bell, rotate the graph by 90 degrees, and you can see that the high-sigma members of the distribution take all the reward and recognition in a limited attention economy.
Re:Being OK with Not Being Extraordinary
by alawrence on Wednesday November 23, 2022 @04:48PM
(#33724952)
Reminds me of this article from Derek Sivers: https://sive.rs/bronze
https://youtu.be/kViCSPXyU8U