News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by bilekas on Monday November 21, 2022 @10:43AM (#33693807)
> Musk's text message conversation during Twitter-lawsuit discovery

I only saw this now : https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/09/elon-...

It's actually kind of incredible how it all seems to work. The cringe too of the fawning is a good indicator why Musk feels he can do whatever he likes, including attempting to troll everyone on his board. It seems so juvenile.

Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by toomuchtodo on Monday November 21, 2022 @10:49AM (#33693879)
Important to note that wealth doesn't improve your character; it simply amplifies who you already are.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by beebmam on Monday November 21, 2022 @11:41AM (#33694577)
Power corrupts.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by dehrmann on Monday November 21, 2022 @01:19PM (#33695910)
The interesting point a nearby comment made was it corrupts those around you. That gets lost in that aphorism.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by api on Monday November 21, 2022 @02:01PM (#33696419)
I think the mechanism is: it makes you surrounded by corrupt people and sycophants, which in turn over time corrupts you.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by User23 on Monday November 21, 2022 @05:31PM (#33699041)
Lord Acton's maxim is "Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely." The dumbed down paraphrases lose most of the insight. It's a little masterpiece of the English language, and as you note, who or what exactly is being corrupted, absolutely or otherwise, is intentionally underspecified.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by Jenk on Monday November 21, 2022 @11:49AM (#33694697)
It's also incredibly lonely at times - despite being constantly surrounded by people - which I figure can warp your mind much like too much solitary confinement can. I don't say this from personal experience (un)fortunately, I say this as someone who has a family member that is a confidant of a billionaire from the middle-east (whom I'll refer to as Bob.) The family member is one of their close staff - travels with them everywhere and is in close proximity, daily - and possibly their most intimate friend as a result of this close proximity for the better part of 40 years, and the below.

In Bob's life he is surrounded by sycophants waiting for handouts, never wanting to be seen to annoy Bob nor lose his favour. Bob does not know who to trust. He has had those that he considered real friends and deeply trustworthy turn out to be thiefs and liars. A former school friend was secretly living in one of Bob's holiday homes _for years_, successfully evading detection by Bob by using his friendship to know where and when Bob will be. He was using his ties to Bob (and Bob's success) to gain favour in his own business and was using some of this money to bribe Bob's staff into silence. Apparently the friend went full "villain in disguise reveals his secret vendetta" when Bob asked if the friend needs help. Bob was heartbroken.

Maids, servers, and other staff are stealing things all the time - Bob maintains and reviews an inventory of stolen property with his security detail, with monthly targets... theft of his belongings is an ever present cost to Bob. e Bob's own family live an excessively sheltered life. His young children's best friends are their personal body guards - former military personnel that must be present around the clock as a stipulation of their kidknap/ransom insurance. This isn't a perceived threat, either. Bob's eldest son was abducted on at least one occassion, by a policeman no less.

Bob's life is managed for him. His staff manage his diet, his wardrobe(s), his social diary, of course his work engagenments take him all over the world often with little notice. He is never entirely certain where he will be and when. He is a slave to his diaries.

Bob spends the majority of his birthdays alone, on the phone to my family member, often crying about how lonely he is.

All that for money seems like a lot to sacrifice. There's also a fascinating effect that happens when the cost of things are literally of no consequence. Sentimentality is the only measure of value and material objects are just.. nothing but utilities.

Anyway, I would safely assume being a billionaire is not all doom and gloom, but it certainly has a different set of life-problems.

Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by lotsofpulp on Monday November 21, 2022 @12:34PM (#33695352)
>Maids, servers, and other staff are stealing things all the time - Bob maintains and reviews an inventory of stolen property with his security detail, with monthly targets... theft of his belongings is an ever present cost to Bob.

I can solve this problem for Bob.

Live a more modest life and not have 10 homes with a million things in them. Maybe stick to first class flights, or even charter private flights when desired instead of owning a plane.

Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by blahblah1234567 on Monday November 21, 2022 @12:57PM (#33695633)
Yep. I'd say the solution is: Live a modest life, and don't advertise your wealth.

I doubt there is any law anywhere prohibiting a millionaire or billionaire from moving themselves and their families to a new place and living a middle class lifestyle under a new name.

Advertising one's wealth is a signal for "I seek validation" and "Please appreciate me"/"Be my friend because I am wealthy"

I doubt anyone is actually stopping Bob from quitting his job, moving to a new country, and living a quaint lifestyle.

Personally, I've up and moved and gone to live in a tent, just to see what it was like and essentially test myself and test the lifestyle of a vagabond.

It really showed me that, as a man, for the most part: you have no worth outside of what you provide for others. Men are expected to provide something for their community-- that is the basis of their social status: competencies (i.e. capable of productive things) and contributions.

Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by polishdude20 on Monday November 21, 2022 @01:39PM (#33696190)
It's not bobs wealth the want though. It's his connections. You can't just quit and move somewhere and expect your connections to be severed. Others will seek you out for your previous connections. Billionaires "know" you now. You have influence over them whether you like it or not.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by PeterisP on Monday November 21, 2022 @03:18PM (#33697374)
For starters, the security issue won't go away by moving to a new place and living a middle class lifestyle under a new name, so they still would need to maintain that security staff which would make them obviously not middle class.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by com2kid on Monday November 21, 2022 @07:15PM (#33700085)
> For starters, the security issue won't go away by moving to a new place and living a middle class lifestyle under a new name, so they still would need to maintain that security staff which would make them obviously not middle class.

There are plenty of rich people who are completely unknown.

The inside of their house is a bit better decorated, and if they fly first class to a private resort, how are the neighbors going to know?

Wise people avoid the hedonic treadmill (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedonic_treadmill), independent of their level of wealth.

Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by Jenk on Monday November 21, 2022 @01:04PM (#33695716)
I dare say Bob has thought of this. But hey, it's easier to just armchair a complex problem away with a simple solution, than it is to acknowledge that complexity, amirite?
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by lotsofpulp on Monday November 21, 2022 @01:08PM (#33695756)
How is this a complex problem? Having to secure one’s assets is a problem to even non human species.

The thing that makes it simple is that all the things Bob has are purely unnecessary. So if Bob feels overburdened by the task of securing them, then the simple solution is to jettison them.

Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by bryanrasmussen on Monday November 21, 2022 @03:04PM (#33697210)
>Live a more modest life and

in other words, don't be a billionaire. However Bob has evidently decided to keep being a billionaire which means he has to maintain and review stolen property etc.

Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by lotsofpulp on Monday November 21, 2022 @03:48PM (#33697723)
I am not aware of any rules requiring people to spend a minimum percent of their wealth.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by Jenk on Monday November 21, 2022 @03:53PM (#33697773)
E: parent edited their post from "I wonder if Warren Buffet has any of these problems" in case anyone is wondering why this post looks out of place.

His wikipedia page documents how he and his family have disowned his granddaughter for revealing family secrets in an interview. So.. yeah, he probably does.

You can bet he has kidnapping insurance on his family, too.

Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by andrei_says_ on Monday November 21, 2022 @12:06PM (#33694927)
The increase of wealth and fame leads to an increase of isolation and decrease of safety and trust.

Beyond a certain point, as a “known wealthy person”, you will never know if a romantic partner cares about you or your wealth. Same for your friends. Relatives. Anybody.

You will not be able to do things you’ve taken for granted - like go to the pub or to a restaurant or on a hike or ride your bike on the bike path - without additional effort and people.

Very, very lonely and depressing.

Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by waboremo on Monday November 21, 2022 @03:12PM (#33697298)
This level of fame paranoia is commonly talked about, but is also extremely hard to reach without actually trying and spending resources in regularly keeping your name in people's mouths. You can achieve a great level of wealth without anybody caring: see extremely wealthy families in most countries who 99% of people won't even recognize even if you show them a picture with their name under.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by eastbound on Monday November 21, 2022 @06:15PM (#33699544)
This phenomenon is extremely interesting. I other words, the billionaires we know of may be almost drama queens, who might (might!) have paid marketing agencies to capitalize on their personal name and image. They fell into the LinkedIn trap, which is certainly a side effect of having to climb the social ladder yourself. You could be Facebook’s anonymous CEO if you had attracted attention on the board’s characters instead of yourself, but you would have dissolved your power; Unless, of course, your family were already in the business and you had been able to rise collectively.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by jokethrowaway on Monday November 21, 2022 @08:01PM (#33700466)
I'm pretty sure I wouldn't be able to recognise the CEO of most companies.

Facebook's one just turned into a meme because of how unlikeable he is

Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by 2143 on Monday November 21, 2022 @11:52PM (#33702087)
Agree.

There's plenty of wealthy stealthy people around, who put a lot of effort into their business and not necessarily into themselves.

They'd fly right under the radar.

The following may not be a perfect example of the above, but just read up on the late Thomas Murphy and Daniel Burke ("Tom & Dan") of ABC. I find their no-nonsense no-bullshit down-to-earth frugal approach to business inspiring.

Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by polishdude20 on Monday November 21, 2022 @01:38PM (#33696160)
Reminds me of turning on cheat codes in games. It get boring pretty quickly.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by sharadov on Monday November 21, 2022 @02:07PM (#33696479)
Excessive money brings lack of trust, the only way to solve this is give away the money - whittle it down to the 10s of millions and watch all the sycophants disappear.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by more_corn on Monday November 21, 2022 @05:39PM (#33699142)
Imagine the world’s tiniest violin playing a sad song for the billionaire who alienated himself from the world. Someone living in one of his many houses when he’s not around! Scandalous! How about have one house and live in it. You can have money and not be an asshole about things.

Warren buffet was once targeted by an armed gunman. The gunman burst into buffet’s kitchen where buffet, his wife (I suppose she’s also buffet) and another man were eating lunch. Little did the gunman know, the other man turned out to be buffet’s hired security. The bodyguard being good at his job quickly disarmed and restrained the attacker.

Why were they sitting and eating together? Because even though buffet was the richest man in the world at the time he behaves like a normal person and if there’s a guy who’s always around you invite him to lunch.

I assure you, I need to know nothing more about the relationship to tell you that Warren Buffet trusts and respects this man. And the feeling is mutual.

In conclusion: I recommend that Bob climb down off the high horse he thinks his billions require him to ride and join the rest of us in normal life. Connection is all around you, you have only to reach back out for it.

As for sycophants, if you want people to be candid you have to give them a safe place to do it. Musk will soon learn that the people who criticized him were right and he shouldn’t have driven them away.

As for people wanting a handout. If your money is a burden to you there’s an obvious solution.

Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by Jenk on Monday November 21, 2022 @06:01PM (#33699397)
Evidently you missed the entirety of the post where I have said my family member is Bob's confidant and intimate friend. And the example of his close, childhood friend betraying his trust. And you just said it yourself.. a literal gunman broke into the kitchen of the Buffet's residence whilst they were eating lunch, but it's the wealthy individual's fault for not trusting enough!?

Did you get lost on the way to reddit, or something?

Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by midasuni on Monday November 21, 2022 @06:15PM (#33699543)
If you are a billionaire you can choose to become a boring old millionaire with $5m net worth, and not have those problems, so the additional benefits must be worthwhile.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by com2kid on Monday November 21, 2022 @07:13PM (#33700072)
Half these problems stem from massive income inequalities in society.

The president of the Netherlands famously bikes to work, vs the US president who travels around with a security detail at all times.

> His young children's best friends are their personal body guards - former military personnel that must be present around the clock as a stipulation of their kidknap/ransom insurance.

A problem stemming from income inequality. Organized crimes, such as kidnappings, start to occur in societies so unfair that being part of a crime syndicate seems like a good life choice for people.

If someone with 10 billion wants to feel safer, spend 9 billion improving the QoL in their chosen city. In an society of stark inequality, no amount of money can buy peace of mind, as you point out, money just buys physical security, and being protected from bad things happening is very different than not having to worry about bad things happening at all.

> Bob spends the majority of his birthdays alone, on the phone to my family member, often crying about how lonely he is.

I've had a few "wealthy", not rich, but 8 figure, friends and acquaintances. Perfectly normal house parties. The house is nicer, and the works of art on the wall are real, but nothing crazy. They also didn't flash their wealth around, very low key, nothing special until you opened the door and looked around carefully.

That said, I'm sure another couple 0's on the end of the bank account balance complicate things.

Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by BiteCode_dev on Monday November 21, 2022 @11:57AM (#33694801)
I don't think it's that weird, there not a lot of differences between people at the top or at the bottom.

It's the fact that they were idealized that makes this dip into their intimacy so strange.

But basically, those communications look a lot like ones that I would have with my own friends. And when I was a students, we were careful about spending 10 euros. Now, we have casual chats about buying a sauna for the garden, and if you think about it, it would sound crazy to someone making minimum wage.

If I had billions, I would talk as casually about huge amounts for actions with big consequences, because I'm still ...me. And I would still make jokes like "you have my sword" since we quote LOTR for fun, not because of social status. What? You thougth billionaires were taking all their texts seriously?

Also, calling people out for making mistake that cost you is kinda what everybody sane does. And apologizing to people when you made a mistake is not being submissive, it's being decent. Again, it reads like text I would send myself.

All in all, it seems pretty standard human behavior to me.

Now you may feel shocked that regular humans have so much power, but remember:

- a lot of luck is involved

- some skills like managing stress or being persistent may matter more than a lot others and those people may have much more than the average person

- this is by design in our system, the problem therefore is not that humans are humans, but that our system promote profiles that you don't think deserve it

- nevertheless, managing tesla or spacex is not something most people would succeed at, so there is probably some human traits those texts are not showing that make them capable of doing billions of dollars of operations

Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by rhacker on Monday November 21, 2022 @12:24PM (#33695187)
So, TLDR is One does not simply "drive" into mordor?
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by jasmer on Monday November 21, 2022 @01:37PM (#33696153)
While it's fair to point out so many of the similarities between the people at the top and the bottom ... there are also differences. Notably, Musk is an outlier in many ways. The vast, vast majority of CEO's are highly conscientious at least in civil terms. They are 'restrained' if anything.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by BiteCode_dev on Monday November 21, 2022 @02:02PM (#33696426)
Again, even if they have some qualities that make them different in order to achieve big things, I would expect a Gauss curve to represent most traits distribution at the top like at the bottom. While most people show restrain, a few will be exhuberant, no matter the sample.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by jasmer on Monday November 21, 2022 @02:14PM (#33696579)
'Restraint' is just something that separates Musk from regular CEO's.

Most CEO's absolutely stand out otherwise.

Here is John Chambers on Charlie Rose [1]

Jean Liu [2]

Just from those conversations you can see how way out from the norm they are.

[1] https://charlierose.com/videos/27937

[2] https://charlierose.com/videos/31044

Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by stackbutterflow on Monday November 21, 2022 @04:15PM (#33698027)
It's interesting that you start your post by demythifying these people only to close it by rebuilding the myth again. It's like we can't accept they are just like us posting on HN.
Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by jokethrowaway on Monday November 21, 2022 @07:57PM (#33700430)
It's not building the myth but explaining the clear difference.

I'm not as conscientious or as laser focused as Elon Musk so my chances of getting there are lower.

Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by BiteCode_dev on Tuesday November 22, 2022 @03:05AM (#33703255)
There is nothing mythical as having qualities that others don't have, and any context or system have a local maximum, which optimize for a certain kind of outcome.

My qualities would have me dead 200 years ago, but make me earn money and social status in 2022. It's not that I'm amazing, it's just the current context is very favorable to those qualities.

Re:Ask HN: Why isn't remote work advertised as a pro environ... by eastbound on Monday November 21, 2022 @06:00PM (#33699383)
> not because of social status. What? You thougth billionaires were taking all their texts seriously?

And it’s mind blowing to me that money can’t buy a better iPhone, they all have to deal with fiddling with the cursor on HN, even princes in the Middle-East, no matter the height of the tower they’re at the top of, they use the same apps as us.