Re:If you (still) work at Twitter and you can code, head to ...
by erulabs on Friday November 18, 2022 @02:19PM
(#33660529)
I disagree strongly, and I currently run an infrastructure team. Things break because of changes to the system. Assuming the entire infrastructure team wasn't fired, it should be dramatically easier to keep the service online assuming all development has stopped.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:If you (still) work at Twitter and you can code, head to ...
by falcolas on Friday November 18, 2022 @02:34PM
(#33660765)
That depends entirely on the status of the stack when the code freeze happened.
If it was unstable, then I'd want several bottles of whisky on hand, because I'd have to work around the stinky pile of dung I'd been left with.
Given reports of debug and dev builds in production just before everything was frozen, I'd probably want to start stocking up on whisky.
Re:If you (still) work at Twitter and you can code, head to ...
by albertopv on Friday November 18, 2022 @02:48PM
(#33660988)
Changes to a system can come in many ways, e.g. we had a noticeable increase in our db size because of a new customer data, what was ok. before wasn't after. Of course it's different for twitter.
And what about security? Update to libraries, dependencies...?
Re:If you (still) work at Twitter and you can code, head to ...
by Xylakant on Friday November 18, 2022 @03:33PM
(#33661653)
Anyone remember the leap second?
Re:If you (still) work at Twitter and you can code, head to ...
by cloverich on Friday November 18, 2022 @04:04PM
(#33662166)
Of course but this is also twitter, not a startup in its infancy. I'm not saying new stuff won't happen (etc), but they have a very mature infra org.