Re:What Happened at Alameda Research
by tommica on Tuesday November 15, 2022 @10:09AM
(#33610039)
But those coins were most likely purchased with real money?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:What Happened at Alameda Research
by matthewdgreen on Tuesday November 15, 2022 @10:48AM
(#33610631)
Yes, but how much real money is the question. I'm not doubting that real money was lost, just wondering if $16B of actual customer dollars ever flowed into the exchange.
Exactly, I always wondered what the real numbers looked like. It's so easy to mint 100 coins, get a friend to buy one at $100, and say you "have" $9,900.
I wouldn't be surprised if the number of actual dollars was less than $100 million.
It’s more than 100M. I know someone who moved 2-300M of btc/eth to ftx and lost all of it
That’s gotta sting. Hopefully only a small portion of their portfolio?
It's easy to see how FTX's assets could be "worth" $16B in the absence of any real money coming into play, but I don't see how they could get to $16B in liabilities that way. The most obvious possibility would be if their liabilities were also denominated in thinly-traded shitcoins, but at this point it seems clear that that wasn't the case.
I think his point is that while it was bought with real money, it couldn't be sold for real money.
If I buy 50 RandoCoins for $1 today, tomorrow it shows that it's now valued at $2, and then the next day RandoCoin is hacked and all the coins are stolen, I didn't really lose $100, I only lost $50.
So he's wondering if the value of loss is being expressed as the money used the purchase the coins or the perceived value of the coins.