This is the single bizarrest and most literally inaccurate use of the phrase “single-handedly” I have ever seen.
What Tesla and SpaceX have done are enormous human undertakings. He did not single-handedly do it by any rational interpretation. The delusional self-confidence he used to get investors to pay for those undertakings is what's about to destroy Twitter.
Anecdotal, but I spend a lot of time on a lot of tech forums, and the vastly prevailing opinion among the folks there is "I wouldn't work at Twitter right now for any amount of money."
The man is a moron. His engineers probably would've developed it anyway, just elsewhere.
Past performance does indicate future success. Nothing about this twitter story, from waving due dilligence, to trying to pull of a signed deal, to treatnent of employees, indicates competent management
Right but that isn't the problem here, Twitter already solved that. What they haven't been able to do is make a short-form blog posting service that's profitable. Everything Musk has announced so far suggests he doesn't really understand how to change that.
what changes, if not these, would make Twitter profitable?
Particularly on the eve of thousands losing their job and arguably having a hard time to find a new one in this market.
How is this not a mindless non sequitur. What the hell does trying to buy ICBMs have to do with “turning around twitter”.