Re:GIMP: Targeted Attack via a Google Ad
by ilyt on Saturday October 29, 2022 @12:01PM
(#33385236)
Yeah, blocking ads quickly became security improvement...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:GIMP: Targeted Attack via a Google Ad
by hawski on Saturday October 29, 2022 @12:23PM
(#33385486)
Always was. Does anyone remember the defacto original ad-blockers that blocking popups were? Firefox was marketed with this feature.
It is basically a condom for the Internet. It makes maintenance for family computers much easier.
Re:GIMP: Targeted Attack via a Google Ad
by geoduck14 on Saturday October 29, 2022 @12:54PM
(#33385806)
But if you block pop-ups, that web page with Rick Astley's cool video popping up won't play.
/s
Re:GIMP: Targeted Attack via a Google Ad
by axiolite on Saturday October 29, 2022 @01:40PM
(#33386257)
> Does anyone remember the defacto original ad-blockers that blocking popups were?
I was using the Internet Junkbuster (and later: Privoxy) in the mid-90s, many years before that. https://web.archive.org/web/19961222061917/http://www.junkbu...
Of course, back then you could just disable javascript in your web browser to protect yourself from malicious sites and annyances, and practically all sites would work perfectly fine.
Re:GIMP: Targeted Attack via a Google Ad
by juunpp on Saturday October 29, 2022 @02:35PM
(#33386742)
Re:GIMP: Targeted Attack via a Google Ad
by 0x00000000 on Saturday October 29, 2022 @09:47PM
(#33390097)
Isn’t this a violation of the first amendment in the same way that a politician blocking someone on Twitter is?
Re:GIMP: Targeted Attack via a Google Ad
by throwaway742 on Saturday October 29, 2022 @10:35PM
(#33390461)
That's cute. You think the NSA and the CIA care about the constitution.