News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The first Gen III+ Nuclear plant begins fuel loading. Parent comment

Re:The first Gen III+ Nuclear plant begins fuel loading by lazide on Saturday October 15, 2022 @10:10PM (#33220487)
Really, 100% of experts think we need only a few hours of storage and reserve if we connect all the grids?

Cites appreciated! I currently see zero.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The first Gen III+ Nuclear plant begins fuel loading by wumpus on Sunday October 16, 2022 @03:00AM (#33221671)
No, no one said that but you.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The first Gen III+ Nuclear plant begins fuel loading by lazide on Sunday October 16, 2022 @10:47AM (#33223994)
It was literally the comment I originally replied to.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The first Gen III+ Nuclear plant begins fuel loading by wumpus on Sunday October 16, 2022 @03:09PM (#33226297)
You replied to

> I heard recently of a study that found 2-4 hours is sufficient along with an interconnected grid.

That, literally, is not the same as:

> Really, 100% of experts think we need only a few hours of storage and reserve if we connect all the grids?

Again, you're not going to have a good conversation if you keep on doing this.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The first Gen III+ Nuclear plant begins fuel loading by lazide on Sunday October 16, 2022 @03:44PM (#33226600)
I take it I hurt your feelings?

Tell me where those two statements you quoted are materially different (keeping in mind I was including the 0% of experts reply later), if you’d like to continue. Or don’t.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The first Gen III+ Nuclear plant begins fuel loading by Dylan16807 on Monday October 17, 2022 @04:43PM (#33239278)
I don't see the difference either*. I would also appreciate you elaborating.

* The parts describing the grid look the same to me, and the percent of experts came from you, when you said 0% of experts agreed with their skepticism.

[ Parent | on HN ]