You're jumping around all over the place. You make a general statement about the Quran, then you decide to limit it to miracles when cornered.

Miracles do violate the normal flow of things, that's the whole point. The Omnipotent Creator bends the rules to His Will. He created the rules after all. There is no logical inconsistency there at all. Just to make it somewhat easier to understand, you can program a simulation with a specific set of rules, but you can make exclusions for a certain time/location.

We have no proofs of a creator, period. Until that, the correct thing to do is to say there's no god until there's some evidence.

There are many proofs. But some people are too blind or too proud to see them. You can check out provingislam.com for a teaser.

That's as scientific as a Marvel Comic Con. That just tries to align with your bias, there isn't any science on it.

It is scientific, just not experimental science which is limited. Look up Islam's Isnad system to learn more. There is nothing like it in any other tradition, faith or historic or otherwise. If you only follow experimental science, then you follow the religion of scientism, which only give a partial picture, and sometimes even an incorrect picture.