News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Adversarial Collaboration by christophilus on Sunday September 25, 2022 @10:59PM (#32978852)
Read anything Charlie Munger writes on the topic. He said something to the effect of “A year in which you fail to kill at least one of your cherished ideas is probably a failed year.”

Anyway, he has a lot to say on the subject and on incentives and human psychology broadly.

Re:Adversarial Collaboration by AstralStorm on Monday September 26, 2022 @05:19AM (#32980998)
Nice platitude, but sometimes cherished ideas are actually true.

A better way to phrase it would be a year when you don't challenge your idea is probably a failed year. It might still win the challenge.

Re:Adversarial Collaboration by bombcar on Monday September 26, 2022 @11:22AM (#32984300)
I think the idea is you have many cherished ideas, and so many are actually false that you shouldn't have much difficulty killing one.

Or, another way of looking at it, your knowledge of so many areas is superficial and a deep dive into any one would let you know how you weren't even wrong, as the saying goes.

You can find people doing it in any HN thread about almost anything - often shows up as "why didn't they just do X". A non-domain expert with a "obvious solution" is almost always missing something major.

Re:Adversarial Collaboration by agumonkey on Monday September 26, 2022 @10:22AM (#32983478)
stuff like psychology of misjudgement ?