A CNN link that’s less ampy:
https://edition.cnn.com/2022/09/15/us/pieper-lewis-sex-traff...
> A crowdsourcing campaign to cover the restitution has raised $330,000 -- more than double what Lewis owes. But Lewis' attorneys must determine whether Iowa law would allow the donated money to be used to pay the restitution
If I owe someone $150,000 and I have $330,000, how exactly can I be prevented from using it to pay?
Even if you prevent me from using it, why can’t I buy a $300k house in cash and then take a $150k mortgage? Sell the house three months later.
Perhaps there is a concern that the croudfunds could be considered a third party payment under subsection 4.
The only explanation that I can think of for the subsection was to prevent a defendant from claiming that a source like the decedent's own life insurance should be counted against the restitution, but that seems a bit far fetched.
https://www.cbs58.com/news/iowa-teen-ordered-to-pay-her-alle...