Re:The Ethereum merge is done
by DennisP on Thursday September 15, 2022 @09:16AM
(#32851445)
A lot of semantic arguments could have been avoided if they'd just called them "scripts" instead.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Smart contracts are still contracts, just a different kind than the typical legal contracts. "Contract" has been used to describe API interfaces. Words can have more than one meaning. "Contract" is also a verb, with multiple meanings.
I think we both know that they were called "smart contracts" to draft off the legal meaning of the term.
Re:The Ethereum merge is done
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th on Thursday September 15, 2022 @12:46PM
(#32854735)
It's money, they should not have been called contracts. Communication is a thing.
Hah, that's a good point.
I interpret "contract" like a contract between two software components. e.g. This is the schema of what our endpoint returns. You can work off of that.
You don't get to a multi billion scam, sorry, valuation, by calling them "scripts". The naming was very deliberate
Re:The Ethereum merge is done
by davidmurdoch on Thursday September 15, 2022 @10:45PM
(#32861463)
Bitcoin Script is literally the name of bitcoin's programming language.
Re:The Ethereum merge is done
by bitxbitxbitcoin on Thursday September 15, 2022 @10:33AM
(#32852679)
Guess smart scripts just doesn’t roll off the tongue the same way.