News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Queen Elizabeth II has died by frakkingcylons on Thursday September 08, 2022 @08:14PM (#32773784)
I'm not against republicanism. Your example, 'Great time to abolish the monarchy. Monarchies are fucking stupid', is not an interesting or well though-out comment. If that's all the effort this commenter felt like giving to this forum, then it should be down-voted.
[dead]
Re:Queen Elizabeth II has died by pvg on Thursday September 08, 2022 @09:22PM (#32774184)
They aren't very interesting but they tend not to start flamewars and shittifying the place or needing moderation.
Re:Queen Elizabeth II has died by steve_taylor on Thursday September 08, 2022 @10:03PM (#32774440)
A lot of us here are coders and we appreciate concise code. Why not, then, concise arguments? Bias wrapped in fake nuance is obvious and time-wasting. "Fucking stupid" is an apt description of monarchism in this day and age.
Re:Queen Elizabeth II has died by dang on Friday September 09, 2022 @03:53AM (#32776544)
Concision means expressing a lot of information in few tokens.

Name-calling and other kinds of fulmination don't express much information.

Re:Queen Elizabeth II has died by xpe on Thursday September 08, 2022 @11:08PM (#32774837)
> A lot of us here are coders and we appreciate concise code. Why not, then, concise arguments?

Concisely: this argument is unconvincing.

> Bias wrapped in fake nuance is obvious and time-wasting.

But how do you know it is "fake nuance" rather than genuine explanation? By being uncharitable?

Re:Queen Elizabeth II has died by xeromal on Thursday September 08, 2022 @11:05PM (#32774820)
It's low effort.