You can leave the other sensors like HRM and pulseox enabled when outside of "activities," and bluetooth is connected by default when in an activity or not, so I don't know where your "everything is turned off" assertion comes from.
So this is 73 hours of actually being active. Even if you're moving all day, you wouldn't ever set it to record GPS data while you're resting, and you'd over double the battery life from what you describe.
I'm a moderately active person, riding and/or running several hours a week, and have an older Garmin device with HRM always on and pulseox enabled during sleep. I charge the thing maybe once a week, usually during a shower after a run. There's really just no way you can squint at this and come to the conclusion that Apple is in the same ballpark on battery life.
I know, I've owned and used Garmin watches since 2011.
> your "everything is turned off" assertion comes from.
Garmin's own measure of battery life - GPS, Pulse Ox, etc. all turned off => smartwatch mode.
> There's really just no way you can squint at this and come to the conclusion that Apple is in the same ballpark on battery life.
Indeed not.
Normal use WITH an iPhone present. I have a feeling the Apple Watch by itself in GPS mode will be much less.
That will be an interesting figure to find out when people start reviewing them.
Only in "smartwatch" mode - ie. pretty much everything is turned off. In GPS mode, you get 73 hours (which is more than the 60 you get on the Watch Ultra in conservation mode, yes, but vastly lower than "18-22 days"!)