Re:The tyranny of the rocket equation (2012)
by michaelmrose on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @05:25AM
(#32734787)
Gravity is the shape of spacetime. Why would antigravity be a thing.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The tyranny of the rocket equation (2012)
by forgotpwd16 on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @06:40AM
(#32735254)
Can be a defect in spacetime. See: https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.09736
Re:The tyranny of the rocket equation (2012)
by YesWeWill on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @05:51AM
(#32734942)
Alcubierre drive essentially changes the shape of spacetime, doesn't it?
Re:The tyranny of the rocket equation (2012)
by mr_mitm on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @06:58AM
(#32735376)
Everything (that has mass or energy) changes the shape of spacetime.
Re:The tyranny of the rocket equation (2012)
by YesWeWill on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @08:34AM
(#32736256)
Sure, my point is that the changes made with Alcubierre drive are controllable.
Re:The tyranny of the rocket equation (2012)
by simiones on Tuesday September 06, 2022 @09:07AM
(#32736588)
Not really. The Alcubierre "drive" is closer to a "shape", a static solution to Einstein's equations. There is no proposed device that actually achieves this shape. The only idea along those lines implies a kind of Alcubierre railroad - you set up a path of negative mass matter (which almost certainly doesn't exist) and then move this with regular means as the ship is approaching, thereby continuing the bubble for the ship.