Re:33% of Pakistan Land Currently Underwater
by morsch on Tuesday August 30, 2022 @12:32AM
(#32646654)
East: Now do the per capita figures. And then do the per capita figures, cumulative back to 1900. Or even 1990.
Re:33% of Pakistan Land Currently Underwater
by mwint on Tuesday August 30, 2022 @12:35AM
(#32646667)
Places that have been civilized for longer have been emitting civilization-byproducts for longer. That shouldn’t surprise anyone.
Re:33% of Pakistan Land Currently Underwater
by unmole on Tuesday August 30, 2022 @12:51AM
(#32646747)
India and China have been civilized for much longer than North America.
Re:33% of Pakistan Land Currently Underwater
by xerxesaa on Tuesday August 30, 2022 @03:21AM
(#32647567)
I think the word is industrialized, not civilized. India and China have been industrialized for a much shorter time.
Re:33% of Pakistan Land Currently Underwater
by addicted on Tuesday August 30, 2022 @07:50AM
(#32649185)
Even setting aside that a lot of China’s GHG emissions are in service of American customers, the per capita numbers for the US are huge. And that’s even before considering that the U.S. is responsible for a lot of the historic CO2 in the atmosphere right now.
Re:33% of Pakistan Land Currently Underwater
by tinuviel on Tuesday August 30, 2022 @12:37AM
(#32646680)
The west is definitely to blame for GW. Look up cumulative historical emissions before spewing bs on the internet.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1224630/cumulative-co2-e...
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1282760/cumulative-histo...
Re:33% of Pakistan Land Currently Underwater
by unmole on Tuesday August 30, 2022 @12:30AM
(#32646641)
Now do per-capita emissions.
Re:33% of Pakistan Land Currently Underwater
by mwint on Tuesday August 30, 2022 @12:31AM
(#32646649)
Y’all are always talking about overpopulation - seems like if a huge population is causing huge emissions, we can blame that. Maybe we should praise the US for having a responsibly sized population.
Re:33% of Pakistan Land Currently Underwater
by tinuviel on Tuesday August 30, 2022 @12:40AM
(#32646694)
Looks like you missed the point. What’s ‘per-capita’?
Re:33% of Pakistan Land Currently Underwater
by pjc50 on Tuesday August 30, 2022 @04:11AM
(#32647893)
It turns out that America has a population of one, once you adjust per-capita.
Re:33% of Pakistan Land Currently Underwater
by addicted on Tuesday August 30, 2022 @07:51AM
(#32649194)
And yet those overpopulated nations are responsible for a tiny fraction of the cumulative GHG in the atmosphere. Whereas countries like the UK and US are responsible for the vast majority.
It’s almost like it’s got nothing to do with population.
Re:33% of Pakistan Land Currently Underwater
by edmcnulty101 on Tuesday August 30, 2022 @12:34AM
(#32646660)
How does that matter. Why do these countries have such massive populations in the first place?
Re:33% of Pakistan Land Currently Underwater
by unmole on Tuesday August 30, 2022 @12:54AM
(#32646754)
> How does that matter.
Someone emitting significantly more GHCs has more room to cut while still maintaining a high standard of living? Someone buring firewood for fuel doesn't really have a lot of other options.
Re:33% of Pakistan Land Currently Underwater
by edmcnulty101 on Tuesday August 30, 2022 @09:21AM
(#32650058)
The reason they're struggling to survive is because they're not having a responsible amount of children, and for some reason future generations don't learn and have responsible amounts of children either.
Overpopulation is the issue.
Re:33% of Pakistan Land Currently Underwater
by netsharc on Tuesday August 30, 2022 @06:56AM
(#32648833)
Do these numbers account for the emissions caused when producing all those cheap plastic toys (and phones, laptops, lithium-ion batteries) that America can buy in Walmart?
In any case, I love the finger pointing and "They should do something first!" mentality...
Countries should stop pointing at what other countries should do and look more at what they themselves can do. Yes, China pollutes a lot and should clean up. And so does the US. It's not one or the other, it's both.
East? You have anything to say for yourself?