High-speed rail board completes environmental clearance in northern California

Re:High-speed rail board completes environmental clearance i... by antognini on Friday August 19, 2022 @09:33PM (#32528173)

To that point, in Prop 1A the voters approved a specific project: namely an SF-LA line with a travel time of 2 hours and 40 minutes. They did not approve a line hitting a string of cities in the Central Valley. To the extent that those alternate paths prevent this main corridor from hitting 2 hours and 40 minutes it is in conflict with the will of the voters.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:High-speed rail board completes environmental clearance i... by MrFlynn on Friday August 19, 2022 @09:52PM (#32528279)

Except they did. Prop 1A does specifically mentions the corridors that need to be built, including the cities that need to be served in section 2704.04 subsection (b)(3).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:High-speed rail board completes environmental clearance i... by KerrAvon on Friday August 19, 2022 @10:30PM (#32528450)

This is exactly right. All of these details were laid out at the time we voted for it! This is what we voted for. Newsom getting cold feet on it hasn’t helped, I’ve gotta say.

[ Parent | on HN ]