Re:High-speed rail board completes environmental clearance i...
by jeffbee on Friday August 19, 2022 @09:09PM
(#32528033)
"I have a better but politically infeasible idea" is just sort of silly. This isn't Sim City. You need the voters.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:High-speed rail board completes environmental clearance i...
by antognini on Friday August 19, 2022 @09:33PM
(#32528173)
To that point, in Prop 1A the voters approved a specific project: namely an SF-LA line with a travel time of 2 hours and 40 minutes. They did not approve a line hitting a string of cities in the Central Valley. To the extent that those alternate paths prevent this main corridor from hitting 2 hours and 40 minutes it is in conflict with the will of the voters.
Re:High-speed rail board completes environmental clearance i...
by MrFlynn on Friday August 19, 2022 @09:52PM
(#32528279)
Except they did. Prop 1A does specifically mentions the corridors that need to be built, including the cities that need to be served in section 2704.04 subsection (b)(3).