News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:More content by people, for people in Search by yrro on Friday August 19, 2022 @05:13AM (#32518915)
My Google experience would be improved immeasurably if there was a way for me to block domains after I decide I never want to see them in my search results again.
Re:More content by people, for people in Search by null_object on Friday August 19, 2022 @05:32AM (#32519038)
Another poster has already suggested `uBlacklist` so I won't waste bandwidth by repeating the link, but I want to underline the utility of this extension, because it's transformed my experience of using Google search for code problems.

Before using this, I was finding the first page of my search results were overwhelmed with StackOverflow-scrapers, which returned SO answers reformatted into some sort of garbage and unreadable 'blog-post'.

Nowadays, after blocking twenty/thirty/fifty(?) of these sites, I get to where I want as fast as I did 10 years ago.

Re:More content by people, for people in Search by nextaccountic on Friday August 19, 2022 @05:36AM (#32519065)
Could you share the url list?
Re:More content by people, for people in Search by hurflmurfl on Friday August 19, 2022 @05:41AM (#32519088)
Re:More content by people, for people in Search by nextaccountic on Friday August 19, 2022 @05:44AM (#32519110)
Nice!

If anyone want to share other such lists, however subjective, I would be grateful

edit: found another one, https://github.com/arosh/ublacklist-github-translation

Re:More content by people, for people in Search by NoMAD76 on Friday August 19, 2022 @06:19AM (#32519284)
Also you can use this for uBlock https://letsblock.it
Re:More content by people, for people in Search by nextaccountic on Friday August 19, 2022 @09:07AM (#32520499)
What's the difference from letblockit to ublacklist? Is letblockit affiliated to ublock origin in some way?
Re:More content by people, for people in Search by NoMAD76 on Friday August 19, 2022 @10:16AM (#32521226)
Don't think they are affiliated, it's just something that I mainly use as a companion for uBlock to help me quickly generate filters etc.
Re:More content by people, for people in Search by nicbou on Friday August 19, 2022 @08:14AM (#32520045)
You can also use it to block paywalled and clickbait content. For example, you can safely ignore anything from cnet.com or digitaltrends.com. There's a few niche-specific sites in my blocklist.
Re:More content by people, for people in Search by ctrlmeta on Friday August 19, 2022 @05:30AM (#32519027)
Searching for Python API docs and getting w3schools and geeksforgeeks results is frustrating. Is there a solution to this problem? Maybe even a browser extension?
Re:More content by people, for people in Search by sitkack on Friday August 19, 2022 @05:56AM (#32519160)
If you are searching for docs, then https://devdocs.io/ might be better than a regular search engine.
Re:More content by people, for people in Search by yrro on Friday August 19, 2022 @05:32AM (#32519039)
That one's easy if you use duckduckgo.

!py urlunsplit

redirects you to:

https://docs.python.org/3/search.html?q=urlunsplit

Re:More content by people, for people in Search by bluecalm on Friday August 19, 2022 @06:20AM (#32519290)
Letting you blacklist a site is one thing. They could improve upon it by letting people downvote/upvote pages and then using their extensive information vault to decide who is somewhat reputable or just similar to you.

I mean, I am 40 years old programmer/entrepreneur interested in sports and traditional board and card games. I like nice restaurants and hotels and even sometimes write Google reviews on them. I have my Gmail account since the beginning and I am paying YouTube and Google services customer. I am using Google phones since the Nexus. Google knows who I am, what I like, where I visit. It's pretty good at estimating revenue of my company. What about using the info for something useful for once and just show me pages people like me liked and don't show me pages people like me think are spam/scam? Please?

Re:More content by people, for people in Search by Mordisquitos on Friday August 19, 2022 @07:56AM (#32519898)
That may sound promising on paper, but I give it at most 6 months before an up/downvote manipulation SEO industry emerges and starts destroying any burgeoning improvements in the quality of search results.
Re:More content by people, for people in Search by headsoup on Friday August 19, 2022 @08:30AM (#32520168)
Not to mention anything even slightly political or divisive in nature will quickly become chaos.
Re:More content by people, for people in Search by stevewatson301 on Friday August 19, 2022 @05:14AM (#32518926)
Re:More content by people, for people in Search by yrro on Friday August 19, 2022 @05:39AM (#32519075)
That looks great, thanks. Installing it now!

I've been burned in the past by relying on extensions like these, which only work until Google change their HTML and then the extension author is (understandably) burned out and doesn't update the extension, and eventually I just give up and uninstall it... I'd be a lot happier if this was a core Google Search feature. But I understand that Google don't make money by blocking their (paying) customers (spammers who run ads) from their search results.

Re:More content by people, for people in Search by blackshaw on Friday August 19, 2022 @05:17AM (#32518937)
Google used to have this feature. Why did they remove it?
Re:More content by people, for people in Search by dazc on Friday August 19, 2022 @05:18AM (#32518947)
Because it was gamed.
Re:More content by people, for people in Search by planb on Friday August 19, 2022 @05:23AM (#32518978)
Then they should have simply ignored the signal, not canned the feature
Re:More content by people, for people in Search by ape4 on Friday August 19, 2022 @06:22AM (#32519298)
Of course, not the same but the Google News thing on Android lets you say you're not interested in this suggestion or don't show me this news source again.
Re:More content by people, for people in Search by ComodoHacker on Friday August 19, 2022 @06:15AM (#32519259)
You mean allow people to block Google properties in search? No way I guess.