> Courts evaluate fair use claims on a case-by-case basis, and the outcome of any given case depends on a fact-specific inquiry. This means that there is no formula to ensure that a predetermined percentage or amount of a work—or specific number of words, lines, pages, copies—may be used without permission.
How might the removal of fair use be used against you? Going to court is an expensive proposition, even if you win
I'll bet that's not established by any legal precedent.
One court case could bring the house of cards down.
What are the other consequences of removing fair use? How many journalists would be impacted? How would your ability to be informed be impacted? How might corporations abuse this to take down reviews or commentary on their products?