Re:The Supreme Korean court says that scraping publicly avai...
by spullara on Friday August 12, 2022 @02:32PM
(#32442303)
that is too restrictive. robots.txt isn't the law.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Supreme Korean court says that scraping publicly avai...
by a1369209993 on Friday August 12, 2022 @05:01PM
(#32443853)
Which why they rightly did not say "if and only if".
Re:The Supreme Korean court says that scraping publicly avai...
by michaelmior on Friday August 12, 2022 @03:03PM
(#32442650)
It's not, but why ignore the express wishes of website owners?
Re:The Supreme Korean court says that scraping publicly avai...
by stickfigure on Friday August 12, 2022 @04:05PM
(#32443270)
The EULA of this HN comment requires you to deposit $2 in my bank account upon reading. Why are you ignoring my wishes?
Re:The Supreme Korean court says that scraping publicly avai...
by michaelmior on Wednesday August 17, 2022 @07:42AM
(#32494920)
Because that is a false equivalency. And also, you never responded with your bank info.
Re:The Supreme Korean court says that scraping publicly avai...
by jacquesm on Friday August 12, 2022 @04:34PM
(#32443559)
What is your bank account?
Re:The Supreme Korean court says that scraping publicly avai...
by wahnfrieden on Friday August 12, 2022 @03:22PM
(#32442864)
out of disrespect for IP
Re:The Supreme Korean court says that scraping publicly avai...
by jayzalowitz on Friday August 12, 2022 @11:17PM
(#32446591)
I mean sure, but the law of dont be a dick and the world isnt a dick to you applies.