Re:Byte Magazine Special Issue: Smalltalk (1984)
by ncmncm on Thursday August 11, 2022 @01:49PM
(#32429370)
They did, but that was not a Smalltalk heritage.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Byte Magazine Special Issue: Smalltalk (1984)
by pjmlp on Thursday August 11, 2022 @03:31PM
(#32430612)
It surely was, here is some learning material.
> Strongtalk is a major re-thinking of the Smalltalk-80 programming language and system. While retaining the basic Smalltalk syntax and semantics, it contains a number of significant advances, including:
> The Strongtalk system was developed in secret in the mid-90's by a small startup company. Before the Strongtalk system could be released, the company was acquired by Sun Microsystems, Inc. to work on the Java® virtual machine.
Re:Byte Magazine Special Issue: Smalltalk (1984)
by twoodfin on Thursday August 11, 2022 @02:19PM
(#32429747)
I'd disagree with that characterization. The earliest work in optimizing highly dynamic languages was done in Smalltalk[1] before continuing in Self. David Ungar was the through line and one of the original designers of Self.
[1] https://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/1986/5376.html
Re:Byte Magazine Special Issue: Smalltalk (1984)
by lispm on Thursday August 11, 2022 @03:04PM
(#32430273)
> The earliest work in optimizing highly dynamic languages was done in Smalltalk
Hard to believe, given that optimizing native code compilers for Lisp were already available.
Re:Byte Magazine Special Issue: Smalltalk (1984)
by twoodfin on Thursday August 11, 2022 @05:16PM
(#32431808)
I’ll accept “of the specific thread that led to HotSpot” as a qualification, sure.
Re:Byte Magazine Special Issue: Smalltalk (1984)
by pinewurst on Thursday August 11, 2022 @07:40PM
(#32433176)
Not true as the ParcPlace SmallTalk(s) were all JITed.