News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Byte Magazine Special Issue: Smalltalk (1984) by ncmncm on Thursday August 11, 2022 @01:49PM (#32429370)
They did, but that was not a Smalltalk heritage.
Re:Byte Magazine Special Issue: Smalltalk (1984) by pjmlp on Thursday August 11, 2022 @03:31PM (#32430612)
It surely was, here is some learning material.

> Strongtalk is a major re-thinking of the Smalltalk-80 programming language and system. While retaining the basic Smalltalk syntax and semantics, it contains a number of significant advances, including:

> The Strongtalk system was developed in secret in the mid-90's by a small startup company. Before the Strongtalk system could be released, the company was acquired by Sun Microsystems, Inc. to work on the Java® virtual machine.

http://strongtalk.org/

Re:Byte Magazine Special Issue: Smalltalk (1984) by twoodfin on Thursday August 11, 2022 @02:19PM (#32429747)
I'd disagree with that characterization. The earliest work in optimizing highly dynamic languages was done in Smalltalk[1] before continuing in Self. David Ungar was the through line and one of the original designers of Self.

[1] https://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/1986/5376.html

Re:Byte Magazine Special Issue: Smalltalk (1984) by lispm on Thursday August 11, 2022 @03:04PM (#32430273)
> The earliest work in optimizing highly dynamic languages was done in Smalltalk

Hard to believe, given that optimizing native code compilers for Lisp were already available.

Re:Byte Magazine Special Issue: Smalltalk (1984) by twoodfin on Thursday August 11, 2022 @05:16PM (#32431808)
I’ll accept “of the specific thread that led to HotSpot” as a qualification, sure.
Re:Byte Magazine Special Issue: Smalltalk (1984) by pinewurst on Thursday August 11, 2022 @07:40PM (#32433176)
Not true as the ParcPlace SmallTalk(s) were all JITed.
Re:Byte Magazine Special Issue: Smalltalk (1984) by igouy on Thursday August 11, 2022 @03:34PM (#32430670)