Re:An incident impacting 5M accounts and private information...
by RL_Quine on Tuesday August 09, 2022 @01:20PM
(#32400870)
It's typically smaller though, not every phone number is allocated and many are in sequential groups. Some are special cased, you don't need to search any number matching `****555***` in north america for example, which cuts down on the search space quite a bit.
Re:An incident impacting 5M accounts and private information...
by mrb on Tuesday August 09, 2022 @02:23PM
(#32401796)
"Quite a bit"? Filtering out ***555**** removes only 0.1% of phone numbers ;)
Re:An incident impacting 5M accounts and private information...
by RL_Quine on Tuesday August 09, 2022 @02:34PM
(#32401990)
That's one example of an invalid range, not all of them. Lots of the area codes in north america just haven't been used for one reason or another.
Re:An incident impacting 5M accounts and private information...
by tomjakubowski on Tuesday August 09, 2022 @11:00PM
(#32407436)
I didn't do the math here but: Filtering out 5*... would remove 10% of the search space. (dots mean "followed by more stars")
Filtering out *5*... would remove 1%. So wouldn't ***555**** remove closer to 0.01%, not 0.1%?
Re:An incident impacting 5M accounts and private information...
by 8organicbits on Wednesday August 10, 2022 @12:30AM
(#32407875)
Try the math, this is a good problem to work through. The position of the 5 doesn't impact the search space like that. 10% of the 10 digit numbers start with a 5. 10% of the 10 digit numbers end with a 5. 5... in your example shouldn't be 1%.
Re:An incident impacting 5M accounts and private information...
by coder543 on Tuesday August 09, 2022 @02:09PM
(#32401574)
St Helena changed to 5 digits nearly 7 years ago.
Re:An incident impacting 5M accounts and private information...
by InfoSecErik on Tuesday August 09, 2022 @02:32PM
(#32401959)
They range from 4 (St. Helena) to 13 (Austria), I believe.