Re:An incident impacting 5M accounts and private information...
by mrb on Tuesday August 09, 2022 @02:23PM
(#32401796)
"Quite a bit"? Filtering out ***555**** removes only 0.1% of phone numbers ;)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:An incident impacting 5M accounts and private information...
by RL_Quine on Tuesday August 09, 2022 @02:34PM
(#32401990)
That's one example of an invalid range, not all of them. Lots of the area codes in north america just haven't been used for one reason or another.
Re:An incident impacting 5M accounts and private information...
by tomjakubowski on Tuesday August 09, 2022 @11:00PM
(#32407436)
I didn't do the math here but: Filtering out 5*... would remove 10% of the search space. (dots mean "followed by more stars")
Filtering out *5*... would remove 1%. So wouldn't ***555**** remove closer to 0.01%, not 0.1%?
Re:An incident impacting 5M accounts and private information...
by 8organicbits on Wednesday August 10, 2022 @12:30AM
(#32407875)
Try the math, this is a good problem to work through. The position of the 5 doesn't impact the search space like that. 10% of the 10 digit numbers start with a 5. 10% of the 10 digit numbers end with a 5. 5... in your example shouldn't be 1%.