News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Marc Andreessen says he’s for new housing, but records tell a different story. Parent comment

Re:Marc Andreessen says he’s for new housing, but records te... by shaburn on Friday August 05, 2022 @12:53AM (#32351852)
"going fine" vs "Despite uproar, few seek to use California’s new housing-density law. What’s stopping them?"..."In San Francisco, 14 property owners have applied to build SB9 projects"

https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/California-hous...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Marc Andreessen says he’s for new housing, but records te... by tptacek on Friday August 05, 2022 @01:00AM (#32351903)
The very opening of the story you just pasted explains why: because San Francisco charged someone trying to use the law a $98,000 fee.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Marc Andreessen says he’s for new housing, but records te... by happyopossum on Friday August 05, 2022 @01:08AM (#32351963)
Which tell’s me it’s not “going fine”…
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Marc Andreessen says he’s for new housing, but records te... by astrange on Friday August 05, 2022 @01:15AM (#32352018)
The entire YIMBY project is what's going fine. A specific bill about ADUs is nice but not expected to solve everything.

It'd be going better if parking minimums and the social housing agency get through.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Marc Andreessen says he’s for new housing, but records te... by whimsicalism on Friday August 05, 2022 @06:51AM (#32354280)
Sunnyvale, not SF. I would be shocked if SF charged that much to deter ADUs.
[ Parent | on HN ]
[dead]
Re:Marc Andreessen says he’s for new housing, but records te... by astrange on Friday August 05, 2022 @01:08AM (#32351964)
Why do you keep replying to yourself with single sentences?
[ Parent | on HN ]