Re:Marc Andreessen says he’s for new housing, but records te...
by shaburn on Friday August 05, 2022 @12:53AM
(#32351852)
"going fine" vs "Despite uproar, few seek to use California’s new housing-density law. What’s stopping them?"..."In San Francisco, 14 property owners have applied to build SB9 projects"
https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/California-hous...
Re:Marc Andreessen says he’s for new housing, but records te...
by tptacek on Friday August 05, 2022 @01:00AM
(#32351903)
The very opening of the story you just pasted explains why: because San Francisco charged someone trying to use the law a $98,000 fee.
Re:Marc Andreessen says he’s for new housing, but records te...
by happyopossum on Friday August 05, 2022 @01:08AM
(#32351963)
Which tell’s me it’s not “going fine”…
Re:Marc Andreessen says he’s for new housing, but records te...
by astrange on Friday August 05, 2022 @01:15AM
(#32352018)
The entire YIMBY project is what's going fine. A specific bill about ADUs is nice but not expected to solve everything.
It'd be going better if parking minimums and the social housing agency get through.
Re:Marc Andreessen says he’s for new housing, but records te...
by whimsicalism on Friday August 05, 2022 @06:51AM
(#32354280)
Sunnyvale, not SF. I would be shocked if SF charged that much to deter ADUs.
[dead]
Some significant legal victories too: https://www.yimbylaw.org/the-general-plan-rules