The customer gets a good deal. We have office 365. Users self manage. They can download and install on devices as they want. Before office 365 I had to install it for them. It's a big win for our business. We have no dedicated I.T. people. I'm a developer that does a little here and there but we work to avoid anything with I.T. costs. SASS is a brilliant solution to our problem.
Yeah I'll pay a subscription for an on going service.
I won't pay a subscription for enabling a feature I then have to maintain. If the seat heater fails, I have to pay to fix it.
Mechanical insurance is the equivalent.
The SASS product is more akin to paying for ongoing use of energy. The more it's used the more an impact there is.
This annoys me so much. It's pretty clear "cannot" in this context means in their opinion non-justifiable. There is no such thing as an objective opinion and those who believe in objective opinions generally are just referring to their own thoughts as objective.
Why?
Not that I am in favor of this but are there really objective arguments to support that?
One can argue that the ecological impact is higher due to the need for additional materials but maybe people buy new a car only because they didn't have feature X and installing it afterwards is too expensive.