News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Vauld suspends all withdrawals, trading and deposits on t... by pjc50 on Monday July 04, 2022 @10:38AM (#31977528)
There was a huge string of bank failures in the 2008 era. However, in those cases, the system worked; failing banks were immediately nationalised and recapitalized in order to keep allowing people to withdraw money. There were a few exceptions, such as Cyprus and Iceland, where banks either had to "haircut" deposits or were for a time unable to allow withdrawals.
Re:Vauld suspends all withdrawals, trading and deposits on t... by AllegedAlec on Monday July 04, 2022 @05:04PM (#31981766)
> the system worked

As in: none of the scum responsible was strung up and all the dipshits that caused all of it were bailed out, you mean.

Re:Vauld suspends all withdrawals, trading and deposits on t... by MrMan on Monday July 04, 2022 @11:27AM (#31978081)
what bank failures in 2008? in the US? cite please
Re:Vauld suspends all withdrawals, trading and deposits on t... by skinnymuch on Monday July 04, 2022 @01:41PM (#31979795)
It is wrong to ask for citations when the answer is so darn easy to get. The first result of the text of your question “[US] bank failures in 2008” yields the answer on any major search engine. Citations should only be asked when due diligence takes longer than 2 seconds.
Re:Vauld suspends all withdrawals, trading and deposits on t... by bshipp on Monday July 04, 2022 @07:56PM (#31982911)
We used to call them "bank failure Fridays". They occurred weekly for a not-so-brief period in 2008. Sometimes 3 or 4 in a single weekend.
Re:Vauld suspends all withdrawals, trading and deposits on t... by skinnymuch on Monday July 04, 2022 @10:04PM (#31983543)
Do you know why Wachovia is not included in the Wikipedia list of the 2008 financial crisis list of bank failures? I remember when that failed and I was watching tv.
Re:Vauld suspends all withdrawals, trading and deposits on t... by bshipp on Tuesday July 05, 2022 @03:22AM (#31985339)
Wachovia failed but because of its size and scope the FDIC couldn't do a simple weekend takeover. Instead, they forced it to sell to Wells Fargo for virtually nothing before it actually went under. It was a different sort of bank failure given its interconnectedness with investment banking.

Similar to the way Merrill Lynch was forced into a shotgun marriage with Bank of America to avoid a collapse, and a number of similar firms during the collapse of Wall Street.

Re:Vauld suspends all withdrawals, trading and deposits on t... by skinnymuch on Wednesday July 06, 2022 @11:53PM (#32009720)
Ah okay right. I just read up on Wachovia and it seems like that’s what the Govt tried doing with Citi. Then WF came in and paid much more. I’m not saying this to say you’re wrong, just what I read as someone who doesn’t know this stuff. And overall your point is correct the Govt was trying to do that and then it seems they then didn’t let Citi fight for Wachovia properly because they were happy WF was buying them.

Yeah the Merrill Lynch one I am more familiar with and how much it has cost BoA

Re:Vauld suspends all withdrawals, trading and deposits on t... by doktorhladnjak on Monday July 04, 2022 @01:07PM (#31979334)
Washington Mutual was the biggest bank failure in US history at the time but there were many other smaller failures too