MrMan
Re:Fed Guy: SVB was particularly poorly run
on Monday March 20, 2023 @01:49PM (#35235597)
yes its the inverted power law thing - the same dynamics that make 1/n approach work in a VC equity portfolio seems like poison in a debt portfolio - only one company out of n survives? fine if that company pops on the equity side, that pays for all the other losers. but on the debt side, it seems like a bad idea lol.
Re:How Silicon Valley Bank Avoided Oversight
on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @07:37PM (#35176193)
by tech savvy do you mean javascript?
Re:Credit Suisse sheds nearly 25%, key backer says no more money
on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @05:59PM (#35175315)
do you know what you are talking about or are you just being dramatic
Re:Silicon Valley Bank unmasks the hypocrisy of libertarian tech bros
on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @09:06AM (#35167736)
its impossible to guarantee all deposits
Re:Silicon Valley Bank unmasks the hypocrisy of libertarian tech bros
on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @07:21AM (#35166530)
that money will be stolen from all the other banks customers. this is not a case of "hypocrisy" its theft.
Re:Credit Suisse finds ‘material weakness’ in reporting, scraps exec b...
on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @04:05PM (#35157576)
If there is any bank that should be dismantled it’s CSFB but it’s survived this long by getting big enough that regulators are afraid to break it up
Re:Moody's downgrades US banking: ‘rapidly deteriorating operating env...
on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @01:54PM (#35155561)
SVB was insolvent your statement is false
Re:SVB shows that there are few libertarians in a financial foxhole
on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @07:26AM (#35149827)
from the comments on HN it seems well-nigh universal.
Re:SVB shows that there are few libertarians in a financial foxhole
on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @07:21AM (#35149781)
it will directly cost all of us, except those who have no bank account. its unsustainable and wrong.
Re:SVB shows that there are few libertarians in a financial foxhole
on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @07:12AM (#35149723)
this is a lie - they were insolvent and their assets were worth less than their liabilities.
Re:SVB shows that there are few libertarians in a financial foxhole
on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @07:09AM (#35149698)
the assets certainly do not exceed their liabilities. stop spreading this lie!
Re:SVB shows that there are few libertarians in a financial foxhole
on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @07:04AM (#35149656)
this is a lie, you are trying to deflect blame on to the Fed to cover for the incompetence of the VCs their companies and the SVB bank. and the upvotes show how all your stupid peers in the tech world would rather tell themselves these lies than face up to their collective ignorance and hubris.
Re:SVB shows that there are few libertarians in a financial foxhole
on Monday March 13, 2023 @10:37PM (#35146658)
This paid astroturfing should not be the top comment.
Re:SVB collapse: Peter Thiel’s role scrutinized as spark of bank run
on Monday March 13, 2023 @10:24PM (#35146547)
False
Re:SVB collapse: Peter Thiel’s role scrutinized as spark of bank run
on Monday March 13, 2023 @10:23PM (#35146541)
This is False. They had the assets, but they declined in value until they were worth less than liabilities. Insolvency.
Re:SVB collapse: Peter Thiel’s role scrutinized as spark of bank run
on Monday March 13, 2023 @10:22PM (#35146526)
SVB was insolvent
Re:Federal Reserve Path Is Murkier After Bank Blowup
on Monday March 13, 2023 @11:27AM (#35137023)
tech / venture capital and other models that rely on ZIRP need to naturally die back and then re-emerge when the environment is more favorable for them.
Re:Federal Reserve Path Is Murkier After Bank Blowup
on Monday March 13, 2023 @11:25AM (#35136998)
that is a lie - the value of their assets is far below their liabilities. mods here need to somehow crack down on outright falsehoods
Re:US regulators bail out SVB customers, who can access all their mone...
on Sunday March 12, 2023 @10:11PM (#35129918)
these VCs and tech billionaires increasingly show themselves to be the enemies of the rest of us. they will control the AI, and will become increasingly brazen in their efforts to enslave those who are not in YC or open AI or which ever cliques the cartels maintain. this is real survival stuff, but the people who need to regulate SV and tech are asleep at the switch and dont understand how dangerous the SV people are. if you work for them, good for you, but this is the beginning of a very bad chapter for the US.
Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve,...
on Sunday March 12, 2023 @09:56PM (#35129745)
those clauses are a sign that SVB and the VCs are in bed together and if you take their money and agree to these terms you are complicit too. the VCs used SVB loans to their portfolio companies to magnify the effective size of their funds without themselves taking on that leverage. SVB got massive interest income.
this is corrupt, the whole thing is corrupt.
Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve,...
on Sunday March 12, 2023 @09:47PM (#35129642)
there is no contagion except that spread by these fucking criminal VCs on twitter.
Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve,...
on Sunday March 12, 2023 @09:44PM (#35129618)
SVB was insolvent
Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve,...
on Sunday March 12, 2023 @09:30PM (#35129459)
this is so fucked I hate these evil SV libertarian crooks. this is wrong
Re:Yellen says government will help SVB depositors but rules out bailout
on Sunday March 12, 2023 @02:39PM (#35124298)
the bank was closed by the FDIC due to insolvency
Re:Yellen says government will help SVB depositors but rules out bailout
on Sunday March 12, 2023 @02:37PM (#35124254)
I am very interested in how that toxic loan portfolio is valued.
Re:Yellen says government will help SVB depositors but rules out bailout
on Sunday March 12, 2023 @01:58PM (#35123660)
yes startups are a rickety vessel and they usually fail, we shouldn't pay for that
Re:Yellen says government will help SVB depositors but rules out bailout
on Sunday March 12, 2023 @01:56PM (#35123598)
that's a lie. and if there is contagion it won't be stemmed by bailing you as a depositor out, we will need that money elsewhere to shore up the system. good luck to you
Re:Yellen says government will help SVB depositors but rules out bailout
on Sunday March 12, 2023 @01:53PM (#35123543)
the depositors shouldn't get paid beyond what remains of the assets of the bank!!!
Re:SVB lobbied the government to relax some Dodd-Frank provisions
on Sunday March 12, 2023 @09:01AM (#35119570)
I mostly agree with this. these players should not be rewarded for using the deposits of the bank as a multiplier of their funds AUM, and the portfolio companies were pawns who willingly played along, or were ignorant and either way deserve to lose.
Re:SVB lobbied the government to relax some Dodd-Frank provisions
on Sunday March 12, 2023 @08:58AM (#35119543)
you are doing a pretty good job trying to explain away the officers of this bank running it into the ground. you havent even started to try to excuse their lending practices. what are you trying to accomplish? their CRO committed career-ending blunders and even with only short term securities on their books this bank could run into serious trouble simply by dint of their customer base all running into trouble at the same time, as is happening. why do you need to posture here man-splaining this shit incorrectly to people who dont know any better