Moving to Radicle would completely eliminate the issues the maintainers had.
Moving to another provider seems like they just "hoping" for the best.
Edit: seems Ethereum is a opt-in optional part of Radicle, so I see how people could believe it to be a part of the whole "Web3" effort.
Well, as long as I can run it without Ethereum, I'm happy.
Cryptocurrencies are just an extra. No wonder, people here hating on Web3 all the time, if they don't understand that.
Web3 is utterly synonymous with cryptocurrency. Plenty of people here understand what it is and what is discussed when the term is brought up.
Your comment was basically "I know better and people who are my opinion know this too".
I'm not that long in the Web3 space, but from what I read I got the impression it's about decentralization, self-sovereign identity and permissionless infrastructure. These are fundamental building blocks, which happen to allow the creation of cryptocurrencies, but, as systems like IPFS or Radicle show, they also allow the creation of different things.
I wasn't taking the high road. It was not necessary nor conducive to good discussion for you to end your comment the way you did.
>Your comment was basically "I know better and people who are my opinion know this too".
No, it was not.
I think, IPFS and Radicle did good here by not making these type of payments mandatory.
They said: if you don't want to run all that stuff yourself, pay someone to host your node. If you want that someone to host nodes in a decentralized matter, you can pay them with crypto.
https://radicle.xyz/