I'm not afraid to make it; there's no burden of proof online.

It's too conveniently timed--and too specific in content--to be coincidence. They didn't leak a list of everybody on food stamps during a slow news cycle.

Everything other states have threatened to do regarding abortion, California has responded to by doing the exact same thing, only replacing the word "abortion" with "guns."

> I'm not afraid to make it; there's no burden of proof online.

Should've been the end of it. Why do you ho on to argue why you think it's true?

California has banned all guns?

Some states have actually banned all abortions so it seems like you should be able to point to a single statewide official suggesting all guns be banned. Otherwise you might be guilty of exaggerating just a bit.

AB 2847 is a clear attempt at a handgun ban (requiring California to ban 3 handguns for every new one- that's not a sustainable process). California also copied the Texas law about suing abortion providers, except for manufacturer's of gun parts (although that one hasn't gone into effect yet)

> I'm not afraid to make it; there's no burden of proof online.

That is a disappointing disregard for modern public discourse.

You may well have something interesting to say. Alas, we will never know.

Days after the most significant SCOTUS gun decision in over a decade (Heller)?

Arguably the second most important one in 2A jurisprudence?

Yeah... still likely just incompetence, dude.

I agree, I'm thinking of Missouri accidentally publishing SSN info on a govt website.

Also the OPM not being able to secure the personal info of everyone with a security clearance.