Here's a famous one:
> Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, Inc., for the 2009 fiscal year was publicly posted; the document included the names and addresses of hundreds of donors.
https://reason.com/2021/03/04/californias-requirement-that-n...
The law they were using to sabotage groups they didn't like finally got ruled unconsitutional.
It's too conveniently timed--and too specific in content--to be coincidence. They didn't leak a list of everybody on food stamps during a slow news cycle.
Everything other states have threatened to do regarding abortion, California has responded to by doing the exact same thing, only replacing the word "abortion" with "guns."
Should've been the end of it. Why do you ho on to argue why you think it's true?
Some states have actually banned all abortions so it seems like you should be able to point to a single statewide official suggesting all guns be banned. Otherwise you might be guilty of exaggerating just a bit.
That is a disappointing disregard for modern public discourse.
You may well have something interesting to say. Alas, we will never know.
Arguably the second most important one in 2A jurisprudence?
Now we have an accidentally-disseminated list of gun owners. "Oops," indeed. Turnabout is fair play?