Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto...
by phlofy on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @08:41PM
(#31915056)
> I'm not afraid to make it; there's no burden of proof online.
Should've been the end of it. Why do you ho on to argue why you think it's true?
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto...
by peter422 on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @06:58PM
(#31914181)
California has banned all guns?
Some states have actually banned all abortions so it seems like you should be able to point to a single statewide official suggesting all guns be banned. Otherwise you might be guilty of exaggerating just a bit.
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto...
by Rebelgecko on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @02:31AM
(#31917115)
AB 2847 is a clear attempt at a handgun ban (requiring California to ban 3 handguns for every new one- that's not a sustainable process). California also copied the Texas law about suing abortion providers, except for manufacturer's of gun parts (although that one hasn't gone into effect yet)
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto...
by mulmen on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @06:02AM
(#31918205)
> I'm not afraid to make it; there's no burden of proof online.
That is a disappointing disregard for modern public discourse.
You may well have something interesting to say. Alas, we will never know.
It's too conveniently timed--and too specific in content--to be coincidence. They didn't leak a list of everybody on food stamps during a slow news cycle.
Everything other states have threatened to do regarding abortion, California has responded to by doing the exact same thing, only replacing the word "abortion" with "guns."