Re:SpaceX said to fire employees involved in letter rebuking...
by huhwat on Friday June 17, 2022 @11:16AM
(#31779445)
If retention and recruitment are impacted, then working hours become longer. If company values are enforced internally but publicly the CEO is acting against those values, then it becomes harder to understand what someone might be disciplined for. The connections are, imo, there.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:SpaceX said to fire employees involved in letter rebuking...
by drstewart on Friday June 17, 2022 @11:23AM
(#31779570)
You can 7 degrees of Kevin Bacon anything to make "connections" like that
Re:SpaceX said to fire employees involved in letter rebuking...
by huhwat on Friday June 17, 2022 @11:26AM
(#31779625)
Then more directly, the letter specifically called out unequal enforcement of company policy. That's direct.
Re:SpaceX said to fire employees involved in letter rebuking...
by AlgorithmicTime on Friday June 17, 2022 @11:38AM
(#31779819)
Company policy does not apply to the owner of the company.
Re:SpaceX said to fire employees involved in letter rebuking...
by mwint on Friday June 17, 2022 @11:35AM
(#31779762)
Commerce Clause vibes
Re:SpaceX said to fire employees involved in letter rebuking...
by achenet on Friday June 17, 2022 @02:21PM
(#31782241)
> If retention and recruitment are impacted, then working hours become longer.
This statement is false in the general case. If the contract says 40 hours, I'm leaving after 40 hours, and if you want me to stay longer I better have a large share of the company. Your inefficiencies as a manager are not my problem as an employee, unless I'm also a shareholder.
Re:SpaceX said to fire employees involved in letter rebuking...
by throw_nbvc1234 on Friday June 17, 2022 @11:58AM
(#31780131)
> If retention and recruitment are impacted, then working hours become longer
or deadlines just get moved out