From the official "Maven in 5 Minutes" tutorial:

    mvn archetype:generate -DgroupId=com.mycompany.app -DartifactId=my-app -DarchetypeArtifactId=maven-archetype-quickstart -DarchetypeVersion=1.4 -DinteractiveMode=false

From the official Rust lang book, Cargo section:

    cargo new my-project

I guess it's a matter of taste...

I think it's worth making the distinction between Maven as a build tool and Maven as a package manager, because the latter I think does work quite well.

I've had enough maven for a lifetime. Too much time spent fiddling with settings.xml files and m2 folders, debugging builds in enterprise environments with dozen module projects and a mix of internal and public dependencies.

Now I guess you debug config.toml and build.rs files all the way up to ~/.cargo.

My IDE does that for me, you are looking at the wrong tree.

Just use `gradle init`. Even that long maven project gen command can be simply hidden by a shell parameterized alias

No disagreement here. My post is a praise of Rust, not "everyone must use Rust!". These languages and tools are also great!

(edit) added 'tools'

Maybe you should retitle your article "Why Rust is one of many great choices for startups"

These comments are still in context of using the language in a startup. Good luck with finding Ocaml, F# or Scala devs.

There are much more Scala devs than Rust devs.

Sounds like a bold claim to me, let alone the "much more" part.

Have you got any data to support it ?

Well, it is hard to get a true picture without some probably paid data, but Scala has been around for longer (especially if we only look at the time when the language was reasonable well known), and I know plenty of companies that have significant Scala code bases even from the top of my head. Rust, not much. Of course I could be dead wrong, but I think as of now Rust has more hype than actual code written in it (but it is not baseless hype, imo the language actually lives up to it so its usage will likely grow faster than Scala’s)

Do you want to discuss market share?

I completely disagree with this sentiment. I don't see how this is relevant for an open source language.