It is a long-standing taboo to split "non-Western" into "middle east" and "asian". Avoiding the split makes the bad numbers less noticeable.
This is after spending a LOT of money and political power.
[1] - https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.61234...
Note: the statistics are heavily censured and the language is always to show "positive" like we increased xx% (from 10% to 15%).
Of course refugees are vastly more likely to be unemployed - 2/3 came from the Syrian civil war and there's no guarantee of entering the country with in-demand skills or any understanding of the language.
Germany has 1.24 million refugees, but it has ~14 million first-generation immigrants including over a million Turks. People who immigrated for work and had to apply for visas are going to have completely different employment outcomes than a surge of war refugees.
They are public right?
Right?
And yes, all of this is easily findable public data.
That is a very strong "stimulus" to keep people working and being integrated. Do we have the same today?
"And yes, all of this is easily findable public data."
Please may you provide the link with first-generation employment status?
My cousin was able to get it right away.
Same happened in other countries as Sweden[1] and in UAE[2]
The conservatives have no power in Germany the most they can do is:
"We will SOMETIME in future make a coalition, but for now we will stay here barking".
It is ok to confront narratives.
[1] - https://archive.is/oUsbj [2] - http://saharareporters.com/2021/06/29/exclusive-uae-suspends...
1. after three months for asylum seekers who are not obliged to live in a reception facility,
2. after six months of asylum seekers with minor children,
3. after nine months of asylum seekers without minor children (even despite the obligation to live in a reception facility).
Comparing to US A 565 Authorization to work in US is at 6-9 months wait.
that study data was from 2016 onwards... There was enough time..
* minimum times, i.e. they don't automatically have rights afterwards, but have to obtain a permission for working first ("Arbeitserlaubnis")
* those minimum times prolong as long as immigrants live in special immigrant housing ("Aufnahmeeinrichtung"), i.e. as long es they don't live in normal housing. Which they can only get if the ministry grants them that (in my town there are still quite a share of syrian immigrants living in that kind of housing, not normal housing in town).
* additionally, even after that, the employer has to show that a) no German of comparable qualification wanted the job, and b) no EU citizen of comparable qualification wanted the job.
Edit:
> that study data was from 2016 onwards... There was enough time..
"onwards" is only 2017. Your source only compares 2016 to 2017. 2016 is the year when most syrian refugees arrived in Germany. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fl%C3%BCchtlingskrise_in_Deuts...
.svg){kind=link}
Are we moving goal post?
Did you somehow miss 16 years of conservative government in Germany?
Actually, scratch that, looking at your account history I can see exactly why...
The latter part is probably on the basis that non-Western immigrants mostly needed skilled worker visas, whereas descendents and 'Westerners' (which apparently maps to "EU members" in this case) don't. Though as with most of the rest of it I'd struggle to see this as a conclusion from advanced modelling and not just a stereotype kept relevant largely by not asking the descendent or 'Westerner' what type of work they'd been doing and how long they'd worked in Denmark