News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple Shipped Me a 79-Pound iPhone Repair Kit to Fix a 1.... by zenexer on Saturday May 21, 2022 @09:32AM (#31457723)
At least some of these tools are name brand. For example, the torque screwdrivers are Wera Kraftform Micro ESD pre-set torque screwdrivers. Apple sells them cheaper than anyone else, as far as I can tell—which is quite curious. Surely if you ordered them in bulk you could beat Apple’s prices, but you can’t order a single set of the same screwdrivers for less than what Apple is charging. I’m also told this is the exact same brand Apple itself uses in their stores.

There’s an alternative, though: head to Home Depot and buy and adjustable torque screwdriver for $60. It’ll have the same 10% tolerance rating. It won’t be ESD-safe—but does it really need to be for a one-off home repair? You could find something even cheaper on AliExpress, I’m sure.

Curiously, this program seems like a great deal for repair shops: for a bit over a thousand dollars, they can get the same tooling that Apple’s own stores use. It makes no sense for a consumer to buy or rent these tools from Apple, but a repair shop? $1,200 is a bargain to say you’re using the exact same tooling as Apple.

Re:Apple Shipped Me a 79-Pound iPhone Repair Kit to Fix a 1.... by NovemberWhiskey on Saturday May 21, 2022 @09:47AM (#31457869)
>but does it really need to be for a one-off home repair?

Again: cue the "Apple provided me with second-class tools that are NOT the ones they used in store and I broke my iPhone" story.

Manufacturers can't possibly satisfy "right to repair" if every single person gets to decide how they want to do the repair, how much compromise they're prepared to take in terms of likely outcome and so on.

Re:Apple Shipped Me a 79-Pound iPhone Repair Kit to Fix a 1.... by Nextgrid on Saturday May 21, 2022 @09:54AM (#31457939)
Apple can trivially comply with Right To Repair by just selling parts, documentation and any software needed to pair new parts.

They don't have to provide tools, just like car manufacturers don't provide tools when you buy parts.

This repair programme is purely a PR move to maliciously (attempt) to comply with Right to Repair and try to prevent actual regulation all while putting the spotlight on how complicated, dangerous and time-consuming repair to discourage people from ever trying it.

Re:Apple Shipped Me a 79-Pound iPhone Repair Kit to Fix a 1.... by NovemberWhiskey on Saturday May 21, 2022 @10:03AM (#31458022)
>Apple can trivially comply with Right To Repair by just selling parts, documentation and any software needed to pair new parts.

... which they do! It's $69.00 for the iPhone 13 mini battery or $70.99 for the kit which also includes a replacement display adhesive and a set of spare security screws. In both cases, you can get $24.15 credit when you return your old battery.

You don't have to get the toolkit; you can put together your own tools and do whatever crazy shit you want with a hairdryer or whatever.

Are you seriously saying that Apple's decision to both sell and rent (on what I'm pretty sure must be a loss-making basis) the tools that they themselves use for the repairs is ... malicious?

Re:Apple Shipped Me a 79-Pound iPhone Repair Kit to Fix a 1.... by mmastrac on Saturday May 21, 2022 @10:15AM (#31458117)
It's designed to make the process complicated and financially risky. That is the malicious part.
Re:Apple Shipped Me a 79-Pound iPhone Repair Kit to Fix a 1.... by NovemberWhiskey on Saturday May 21, 2022 @10:19AM (#31458155)
What? Let me get this clear: Apple provides no tools - you are OK with this. Apple provides optional tools, which are the ones they use - this "make[s] the process complicated and financially risky".

Is that what you are saying? Can you walk me through your logic because it's escaping me.

Objectively, it is a risky process to do without the right tools based on feedback from people who have actually done it on a regular basis; ref. the poster upthread here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31457776

Re:Apple Shipped Me a 79-Pound iPhone Repair Kit to Fix a 1.... by Nextgrid on Saturday May 21, 2022 @10:19AM (#31458161)
My problem with this process is that it's a low-volume, just-in-time system where you have to order the part, do the repair and send back your old part in a limited timeframe otherwise you are overcharged, not to mention the final step of having Apple support pair the new part to your phone to disable the warnings.

It's unnecessarily annoying and admin-heavy. Compare that to just buying a handful of batteries and keeping them "just in case" so you can then do the repair in your own time as needed. I currently do that but have to use grey-market parts as Apple won't sell them to me without the aforementioned restrictions.

Re:Apple Shipped Me a 79-Pound iPhone Repair Kit to Fix a 1.... by NovemberWhiskey on Saturday May 21, 2022 @10:36AM (#31458271)
I mean, I don't even know what to say, how often do you think consumers are having to replace the batteries in their phones? The idea that people would keep stock on hand is just beyond absurd.

Returning cores for a price rebate is a totally standard industry practice. You apparently get 18 days to initiate the return and Apple gives you a free return label.

Re:Apple Shipped Me a 79-Pound iPhone Repair Kit to Fix a 1.... by Nextgrid on Saturday May 21, 2022 @10:43AM (#31458322)
I'm not saying people should be keeping stock on-hand. I'm saying that their current system is clearly malicious compliance as all that admin also costs them more, so the only reason I can see is extra annoyance to make self-repair less attractive (and prevent third-party shops from using this program as a source of genuine parts).

> Returning cores for a price rebate is a totally standard industry practice.

Depends for what. A worn down (or outright destroyed, if you screwed up and couldn't get it out intact) battery has zero value beyond its raw materials, which are much less than the cost of shipping it back (the eco-friendly option here is to drop it off at a local recycler which will collect and ship them in bulk).

Re:Apple Shipped Me a 79-Pound iPhone Repair Kit to Fix a 1.... by Someone on Saturday May 21, 2022 @10:03AM (#31458018)
Browsing https://selfservicerepair.com/home, it seems to me they do more or less exactly that (the parts sometimes are bundled with mounting screws, the manuals assume you have professional tools, and you’ll have to call them to DRM ‘register’ your new part with the other hardware.

I can’t find the requirement to rent this set of tools on that site (disclaimer: I can’t fully emulate a sale, as the site asks for an IMEI, and I don’t have a device for which they sell parts)

So, from my browsing, renting the tools seems optional.

Re:Apple Shipped Me a 79-Pound iPhone Repair Kit to Fix a 1.... by gjsman-1000 on Saturday May 21, 2022 @09:58AM (#31457985)
Did you even research the program? Apple’s SSR store will happily sell you the parts without the toolkit if you want to improvise and use the iFixIt method of repair. You are not required to buy or rent any tools when placing an order.
Re:Apple Shipped Me a 79-Pound iPhone Repair Kit to Fix a 1.... by Nextgrid on Saturday May 21, 2022 @10:26AM (#31458203)
> Did you even research the program?

Yes, I did. I summarized my thoughts on it here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31458161

I still stand by my opinion that this is malicious compliance to prevent formal Right To Repair legislation - not necessarily about the tooling (indeed, optionally providing tooling is a good move) but the fact that besides the problems mentioned in the linked comment, the actual selection of parts is minimal, hopefully for the time being.

Re:Apple Shipped Me a 79-Pound iPhone Repair Kit to Fix a 1.... by zenexer on Saturday May 21, 2022 @03:30PM (#31460993)
> Again: cue the "Apple provided me with second-class tools that are NOT the ones they used in store and I broke my iPhone" story.

Oh, I’m not complaining about the tools. If they didn’t have an ass-backwards policy that could be construed as preventing you from using the tools on anything other than an approved Apple product, I’d have a rental kit shipped to me and just pay the security deposit. Sure, I could buy the tools outright, but then I wouldn’t get the cool cases, and the policy still seems to imply the tools are only to be used for Apple products.

Again, this is great for repair shops. These are great tools at reasonable prices that are meant to last. But y’know what would be even better? Making a battery that you can replace with a fingernail.

Re:Apple Shipped Me a 79-Pound iPhone Repair Kit to Fix a 1.... by ynniv on Saturday May 21, 2022 @09:44AM (#31457842)
this program seems like a great deal for repair shops

Which AFAICT is what Right to Repair is about anyway.