Re:From Cyberpunk to Solarpunk: Technics and the Cities of t...
by blamestross on Tuesday May 10, 2022 @06:14PM
(#31333377)
Optimism is necessary if insufficient for success. In the face of unmitigated existential threat, irrational optimism is rational.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:From Cyberpunk to Solarpunk: Technics and the Cities of t...
by chrisweekly on Thursday May 12, 2022 @09:00AM
(#31353460)
In order to build the future we want, it's necessary to imagine it. Right?
Re:From Cyberpunk to Solarpunk: Technics and the Cities of t...
by trinsic2 on Thursday May 12, 2022 @11:26AM
(#31355555)
This is why I like the idea of solarpunk architecture being the catalyst for social/political change.
"Life cannot be delegated; it must be integrated. Solarpunk is not just about beautiful green futuristic cityscapes, it is about projecting an image of the future free from authoritarian technics."
Re:From Cyberpunk to Solarpunk: Technics and the Cities of t...
by LewisMumford on Thursday May 12, 2022 @02:42PM
(#31358404)
The lived environment isn't sufficient to catalyse political change, as seen in Singapore, but it's definitely a start. Projecting a better future is the first step in making it into reality. If these ideas start to pervade the public consciousness, engineers and designers will start integrating them into their projects and this could be politically subversive in and of itself.