News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GitHub will require 2FA by the end of 2023 by WithinReason on Thursday May 05, 2022 @03:28PM (#31277484)
Am I the only one that thinks that 2FA actually increases the probability of losing access to an account? It's only a matter of losing the 2nd factor.
Re:GitHub will require 2FA by the end of 2023 by deadbunny on Thursday May 05, 2022 @04:42PM (#31278158)
You can have multiple second factors. I have 2 YubiKeys (one on me, one in a safe place) and then I have the standard TOTP codes on my phone using Authy.

If I manage to lose my phone, live and backup yubikeys then I have recovery codes.

It's going to have to be something pretty drastic to cause me to loose all of that.

Re:GitHub will require 2FA by the end of 2023 by IYasha on Monday May 09, 2022 @07:58AM (#31313054)
No, we're here with you. I'm also wondering if being responsible for storing and using passwords is THAT BIG OF A DEAL??? Even mathematically, probabilities of two failing points are adding. I've been locked away from mail, banks and gods know what else just because I didn't have my phone or computer nearby, was in different country, in a place without network coverage, haven't paid for cell in time, etc. etc. etc. and absolutely positive that 2FA (at least that requiring on-line presence) is evil. The ONLY THING that can really protect and help you - is good HUMAN tech support. Where you can call, explain yourself, prove ownership and regain access to a service. Up to the point of having to go to of video-call office yourself and beyond. Yeah, I'm completely aware that some corporations don't even have humans (hello, Goolag!) employed - and trying to stay clear from them.
Re:GitHub will require 2FA by the end of 2023 by rstuart4133 on Saturday May 07, 2022 @11:03PM (#31300873)
Well, I've lost control of accounts and I suspect a few of us have. Fortunately the one I lost wasn't important.

But my response wasn't to turn off 2FA. It was the reverse - to turn on all forms of authentication made available, for all acccouts. If I lost control of it one way, I had another.

By the by, if you read the spec, FIDO expects you to do this in preparation for the day you lose your token. So no you are not the only one - people think about it all the time.

Re:GitHub will require 2FA by the end of 2023 by jason0597 on Thursday May 05, 2022 @03:49PM (#31277699)
What people should do is have a small SD card with all of their private keys and passwords stored away safely. This SD card should be kept in cold storage (e.g. in a safe where you keep personal belongings), and never be accessed unless in absolute emergency (lost your YubiKey etc and can't get in anywhere, etc.)
Re:GitHub will require 2FA by the end of 2023 by Lifelarper on Thursday May 05, 2022 @04:06PM (#31277860)
SD cards are horrendous for long term storage. Probably the worst medium for such a task.
Re:GitHub will require 2FA by the end of 2023 by adamiscool8 on Thursday May 05, 2022 @04:23PM (#31277983)
What is the best? Cursory googling suggests SD cards last ~decades at normal usage [0], and in this context where it's barely accessed, maybe longer?

[0] https://www.sdcard.org/consumers/faq

Re:GitHub will require 2FA by the end of 2023 by justinclift on Friday May 06, 2022 @10:31AM (#31285557)
Probably depends on the quantity of data. If you're talking GB's or TB's of digital data, then maybe "archival grade" DVD's or BluRay's.

https://www.verbatim.com.au/product-category/data-storage/op...

If it's instead just a few short strings of text (eg GH password recovery codes), then you could use physical storage.

eg engrave the codes into something that'll survive extremes (granite?), and keep them in a fire proof safe.

Or something along similar lines. Probably don't engrave into glass though, due to that potentially shattering in some situations.

Re:GitHub will require 2FA by the end of 2023 by 0x073 on Thursday May 05, 2022 @04:46PM (#31278199)
If you go to bluray.com you probably can read the same only for blu-ray.

Better search for a neutral source.

Re:GitHub will require 2FA by the end of 2023 by _whiteCaps_ on Thursday May 05, 2022 @05:44PM (#31278715)
I wrote some scripts to generate QR codes, then printed them to photo paper.

https://github.com/alexjh/gpg-backup/blob/master/Makefile

Back then I thought that QR codes were a bit of a gimmick but now I'm way more confident that I'll be able to read them in the future.

Re:GitHub will require 2FA by the end of 2023 by IYasha on Monday May 09, 2022 @08:00AM (#31313066)
My choice are 8cm DVDs of decent quality. And inability to quickly overwrite/damage your data is a bonus.
Re:GitHub will require 2FA by the end of 2023 by Brian_K_White on Friday May 06, 2022 @12:57AM (#31281476)
laser print
Re:GitHub will require 2FA by the end of 2023 by jrochkind1 on Friday May 06, 2022 @12:31PM (#31287090)
Do most people have a "safe where they keep their personal belongings"?

i guess it would presumably be on-premises, because you're going to have to take it out to add recovery codes to it every time you add a new TOTP or whatever (or create a new private key or password) right? If it was, say, a safety deposit box at a bank, odds are it's not gonna wind up with most of your stuff. Even on-premises, the task of making sure "cold storage" stays sync'd with my evolving passwords, private keys, TOTP recovery codes, etc, seems like something I'm unlikely to keep up with.

Re:GitHub will require 2FA by the end of 2023 by marssaxman on Sunday May 08, 2022 @01:42PM (#31306257)
I have an IronKey for this purpose.
Re:GitHub will require 2FA by the end of 2023 by johannes1234321 on Thursday May 05, 2022 @03:46PM (#31277663)
For that there are the revoke code. And the backup phone number.
Re:GitHub will require 2FA by the end of 2023 by Biganon on Thursday May 05, 2022 @06:37PM (#31279147)
Or even better than the one time codes they give you, you can simply store the secret itself, on a piece of paper in a safe.
Re:GitHub will require 2FA by the end of 2023 by zhfliz on Thursday May 05, 2022 @03:43PM (#31277643)
easily solved by adding multiple MFA options, e.g. multiple security keys.
Re:GitHub will require 2FA by the end of 2023 by bamboozled on Thursday May 05, 2022 @03:40PM (#31277600)
Github has alternative recovery methods though too, such as 2FA over SMS.
Re:GitHub will require 2FA by the end of 2023 by Fuzzwah on Thursday May 05, 2022 @05:14PM (#31278493)
And support can help out as long as you can show that you can ssh into a github host using the private key of one of the public ssh keys assigned to your account.
Re:GitHub will require 2FA by the end of 2023 by jrochkind1 on Friday May 06, 2022 @12:28PM (#31287064)
That makes some sense, and seems to me a nice option. Is it documented anywhere that that is an option, that they will do that?
Re:GitHub will require 2FA by the end of 2023 by jwilk on Thursday May 05, 2022 @05:46PM (#31278731)