Re:Lies we tell ourselves to keep using Golang
by rob74 on Friday April 29, 2022 @10:20AM
(#31205486)
Pointing out shortcomings isn't impolite - writing that Go wasn't designed, but happened by accident is however (IMHO).
Re:Lies we tell ourselves to keep using Golang
by samhw on Friday April 29, 2022 @12:49PM
(#31207566)
> writing that Go wasn't designed, but happened by accident is however [impolite]
That's one of the most mild and inoffensive criticisms I've ever read on the internet. You can't seriously be indignant about that.
Re:Lies we tell ourselves to keep using Golang
by clpm4j on Friday April 29, 2022 @12:25PM
(#31207248)
Especially since it was designed by computer science luminaries who are almost certainly better programmers/engineers than the author of this blog.
It's also more accurate to say that Rust wasn't designed / was an accident since it was technically a side project of one guy at Mozilla.
Re:Lies we tell ourselves to keep using Golang
by samhw on Friday April 29, 2022 @12:53PM
(#31207615)
Both languages were designed by probably better programmers than most in this thread. For that matter, the vast majority of successful programming languages surely were. I'm utterly lost at how that relates to anything.
One can plainly be a good programmer and yet create a bad language. I'm sure you are well-informed enough to analyse his argument on its merits, even if it were written by a gang of monkeys with typewriters.
Re:Lies we tell ourselves to keep using Golang
by oxnrtr on Sunday May 01, 2022 @10:56AM
(#31225518)
The truth cannot be impolite.
I see this article being an address to these criticisms (which are not limited to this forum, I've seen similar arguments on twitter, etc.).
Pointing out shortcomings isn't really impolite or unfair. The author specifically mentioned shortcomings of Rust as well.
[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31191700