News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by jakecopp on Monday April 11, 2022 @09:32PM (#30997511)
And the battery life!! My first Pebble still had about 7 days of battery life after ~6 years of use, just unreal. I think it was rated for 10 at launch. Seeing 10% battery usually means I'm good for a day, maybe two.

I'm on my second Pebble Time Steel now - I only had to get a new one because the waterproofing failed while I was surfing!

I've had two separate instances of strangers (in Sydney) coming up to me and bumping their wrist to my wrist, because they also had a Pebble and recognised mine. Really lovely community.

Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by akersten on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @01:07AM (#30998840)
I'm actually shocked that battery life wasn't mentioned at all in this article. A watch that you don't have to charge for a week+ was Pebble's #1 differentiator. No other smart watch had that feature, and (almost) no other smart watch has it today in 2022.

The super lightweight C-based runtime and eInk display combination was a genius move. But I'm not sure they realize it, even in hindsight, other than alluding to the "geeky/hacker user base." As one of those geeky hackers, I didn't buy the watch because it looked like an off-brand Casio calculator, I bought it (and came back to buy the Pebble Steel and Time 2) because I don't have to plug the damn thing in every night. And I'd buy another one today if I could.

Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by marcusjt on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @06:10PM (#31008872)
I've always thought it ludicrous that a smartwatch (like the Apple watch) should have to be charged daily - makes it pretty much useless to me, especially if it can't even tell the time! I realise that the latest Apple watches last longer but I still find them overengineered and ridiculous.

Since nobody else seems to have mentioned it, I'll mention that I've been delighted to have an AmazFit Bip (with a 176x176 colour e-ink transflective screen) on my wrist for almost 4 years now (I previously had a Pebble) and it still goes at least 3 weeks between charges (previously more like 4 weeks) despite being connected to Bluetooth, taking my pulse every few minutes, and selectively relaying notifications to my wrist.

See https://m.gsmarena.com/amazfit_bip_review_another_shot_at_th... for details but many models have been released in the years since 2018, with higher resolution screens, they last even longer between charges ("up to 45 days") plus allow you to reply with preset messages and control music (sadly lacking from the model I have especially since the Pebble could do that) so perhaps I should treat myself to an upgrade sometime.

Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by robinsoh on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @11:42PM (#31010985)
> with a 176x176 colour e-ink transflective screen

Citation needed. afaik no such technology as "e-ink transflective screen" exists yet although there were some startups trying to propose such concepts.

I think you mean "transflective lcd screen" which is not e-ink.

Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by adambyrtek on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @05:34AM (#31000426)
> No other smart watch had that feature, and (almost) no other smart watch has it today in 2022.

That's not really true, unless your definition of a smartwatch is limited to Apple/Android devices with LED displays. I use Garmin Fenix with a transflective display which lasts about 2 weeks on a single charge. However, like with Pebble, there are some tradeoffs: the display is not as bright (but clearly visible in the sun), it has less colors, and the screen resolution is lower.

Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by BlueTemplar on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @07:28AM (#31001127)
There are two definitions of "smart" :

- having a wide set of capabilities

- being sufficiently open so that an "ecosystem" of third party developers can form

I assume that Garmin Fenix succeeds at the first one, but fails the second ?

Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by jjkaczor on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @10:12AM (#31002988)
It may not be as open as the Pebble, but Garmin does have a development ecosystem - :

https://developer.garmin.com/

Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by nradov on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @10:54AM (#31003543)
Numerous Garmin smart watches sold since at least 2019 have over week of battery life. Mine would probably last 2 weeks if I didn't use the GPS every day.
Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by MrMember on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @01:26PM (#31005676)
I have a Garmin Instinct, the battery life is insane. Using the GPS for on average an hour a day I get a week to a week and a half on one charge. Without using the GPS at all it can go 3-4 weeks.
Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by robinsoh on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @09:02AM (#31002070)
> The super lightweight C-based runtime and eInk display combination was a genius move.

Pebble didn't use eInk. It used transflective LCD.

Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by drewzero1 on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @11:40AM (#31004162)
Personally I think it was a mistake to market the transflective LCD as "E-Paper" when eInk was already an established product. They're very different technologies and people still get them confused.
Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by robinsoh on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @01:35PM (#31005807)
I agree. I suspect someone at Pebble did that on purpose because I asked specifically about this during their kickstarter and they declined to change their wording.
Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by Deganta on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @02:30AM (#30999327)
I often hear about the great battery life of the Pebble watch, and that there is no smart watch with a comparable one. Thats kind of true, depending what one wants from their smart watch. But there actually is an alternative if you only need basic smart watch capabilites: Sport Watches. I personally only want notifications from my phone, which my Garmin Forerunner 245 can do perfectly well. And it has a battery life of up to 2 weeks, depending on how much I use the GPS of the watch.
Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by happymellon on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @04:49AM (#31000134)
> I often hear about the great battery life of the Pebble watch, and that there is no smart watch with a comparable one.

My Fitbit Versa 3 has a week long battery life, can do Google/ Alexa Assistant, Google Maps, Spotify, GPS, health montoring, voice response to text messages although it does use its own Pay system. I think what they mean is that Samsung and Apple don't have watches with comparable battery life.

I would still switch back to my Pebble if they made it again.

Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by perth on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @04:06AM (#30999879)
Yeah but the issue with a lot of sport watches are they have a "tacticool" look that doesn't look very fashionable, the Pebble had the unique aspect of having models that looked stylish while still maintaining their battery life.
Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by samatman on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @07:57AM (#31001371)
Withings wins that particular narrow field handily, their watches do about four things: notify, tell time, track steps, and heart rate.

But they have real hands, and the 'smart' part is subtle enough that most people just see a watch, a couple weeks battery is realistic as well.

Pebble hit a sweet spot in terms of how much you can do with it, while being good looking with a hardy battery. If we limit the comparison to the last two of those things, Withings is in the lead, not to mention still actively sold and supported.

Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by danuker on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @04:53AM (#31000162)
Fashion is what you define it to be.

Also, maybe a customer will remember the sporty watch contrasting with the formal suit, and call you instead of a competitor.

Also, Zuckerberg wears t-shirts and jeans.

Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by thatguy0900 on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @06:15AM (#31000673)
Are you implying Zuckerberg is fashionable? I'm not sure I've ever seen a positive comment about his appearance, in fact he's usually said to not even look like a living human
Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by Cthulhu_ on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @05:04AM (#31000227)
Nobody would want to fuck Zuck though.
Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by joking on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @05:23AM (#31000362)
you have the venu sq, that looks nice, not the best battery however, but 5-6 days it's not bad.
Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by ericd on Monday April 11, 2022 @09:52PM (#30997654)
Oh, that's crazy that it still lasts 7 days. I guess it's had a lot fewer cycles than a smartphone battery typically gets in that time, because of the long battery life.

And looking on eBay, used Pebbles are actually surprisingly affordable, like $20-50.

Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by Markoff on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @05:11AM (#31000277)
used Amazfit Bip cost also nothing and will still last you 3 weeks with always on display and Bluetooth enabled, Pebbles are overrated
Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by ChuckNorris89 on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @06:40AM (#31000821)
Same. The Bip has a 30 day battery life. There's no SDK though so it's not as tinker friendly but when used with Gadgetbridge I get the privacy and some neat features on top. Plus there's a pretty big online community around hacking it.
Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by m-p-3 on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @02:07PM (#31006263)
No 3rd party apps for the watch of any kind, it has no ecosystem. I had one, and yes the battery time was good, but everything else about it was sub-par.
Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by Markoff on Wednesday April 13, 2022 @02:15AM (#31011709)
And how useful is that on Pebble sized screen? I can read all notifications on Bip (that's reason I bought it for), answer/reject calls, track all my vital signs, use it as navigation, use it as flashlight in night (that's second most used feature besides checking the time/date) and with little hacking I could use it as remote control for music player.

Please list useful apps I am missing and which are usable on small watch screen, because anything requiring typing is certainly not useful and it's horrible experience and I never use some predefined quick replies.

Obviously Bip with open system would be ideal, but if I have to choose between expensive abandoned old thick Pebble with crappy battery life but abandoned dead ecosystem of apps and cheap ultrathin light Bip with amazing battery life in weeks with all basic features one can require, it's easy choice and reason why nobody knows Pebble besides few nerds, why the company failed, but Bip is much more known about ordinary people and its brand still going strong (sadly with transreflective displays and amazing battery life abandoned).

Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by m-p-3 on Wednesday April 13, 2022 @12:30PM (#31016707)
One app I used quite often on the Pebble is a TOTP app, where I could retrieve my code from anywhere, even if I forgot my phone that day. Since the battery life was awesome, it was comforting knowing I wouldn't get locked out of my stuff easily.

I also used an app to see a camera preview from my phone and as a remote shutter, I also relied on NavMe to see the Google Maps direction while walking or while riding a bike.

Another app I was using was to send HTTP requests to toggle some of my IoT stuff, that was quite handy too.

IIRC the quick replies could be entirely customized, and I found myself using them quite often.

Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by Markoff on Wednesday April 13, 2022 @04:57PM (#31020164)
fair enough, TOTP ain't possible on Bip, though camera shutter and navigation are both available

but those things you described as not available are extreme niche, so Bip would be still winner for most of the people

Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by jclardy on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @07:52AM (#31001331)
Overrated? By who? The amazfit came out like 2 years ago, Pebble launched with 7 day battery in 2012...
Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by Markoff on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @08:52AM (#31001967)
overrated since 2018 release of Amazfit Bip, yes, it has more features than Bip but they are hardly usable on such small screen anyway
Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by m-p-3 on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @09:14AM (#31002213)
Sadly, mine last only a day now, so I switched to the "Bangle.js 2" which I ordered during the Kickstarter. I believe it's based on the SMA-Q3 but with a reverse-engineered firmware (Espruino) and apps are all JavaScript-based.

https://hackaday.io/project/175577-hackable-nrf52840-smart-w...

https://www.espruino.com/Bangle.js2

Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by hobo_mark on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @09:44AM (#31002620)
My Pebble 2 still has 7 days of battery life to this day :-)

I managed to procure a couple of cheap spare Pebbles over the years in case this one ever gives up the ghost but I'm unlikely to ever give the platform up so long as GadgetBridge supports it, I also wrote some software for it that I still use every day to track my working hours (it had a C SDK).

Re:Success and Failure at Pebble by Markoff on Tuesday April 12, 2022 @05:11AM (#31000268)
that's pretty horrible battery life, with original Amazfit Bip you can have easily 35-40 days battery life out of the box and even after years 20-25+ days with always readable display, always on Bluetooth, I'm now on my second one since first one fall apart, then I had short stint with OLED smart watch which lasted only few days and had problem to read it outdoors until I gave up and after few months bought used Amazfit Bip for 20USD, which serves me until now

actually main reason why not go for Pebble instead Amazfit Bip would be for me extremely short battery life (and huge bezel mentioned in article) and price, while hardly offering more useful features worth the disadvantages