He is actually talking about this in his tweets: "fixing a bug in kube-apiserver might retain a GCP customer", now he can put revenue associated with that customer into his perf packet?
Keeping the ship running seems to be continuously undervalued at these companies compared to how they value building a new wing.
You still have to do the above and beyond work elsewhere, but in FAANG some people will get into the conversation by ditching maintenance and focusing solely on the stretch work, and they tend to have success getting promoted.
Yes, otherwise it can totally be that his impact is not that large actually.
I've stopped using many tools because they created just too many issues. And in that case you will not write these emails as a customer, you just leave (as long as there are better options).
Agreed, and you can measure and include similar statements regarding your Kubernetes contributions. However, if what you have to show for it is making the life of a hundred random startups easier, well why exactly should a Google promo committee care? Unless it is the specific goal of your business unit to make this impact, then the work is meaningful again.