I wouldn't call 9/11 "limited". Nor is Yemen, or, earlier, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Iran etc.

The fundamental of all of these is oil and now, gas. Removing the demand for these will remove the necessity of engaging with these propped up monarchies and autocracies.

> wouldn't call 9/11 "limited"

Relative to what's going on in Ukraine, it is. 9/11 was a massive terrorist attack. Next to the scale of state-on-state warfare (a category it does not belong in), it was a rounding error.

Agree that de-carbonising our economy will remove our need to support these regimes.

> creates a new category of security risk we haven’t had close to home in a while

And Europe is reacting to it appropriately.

My point was that it's ultimately about geopolitics, not the feigned morality the GP was alluding to.

>The Arab monarchies largely keep their messes in their own backyards. When there has been leakage, it has been limited.

9/11