Re:Twitter user sentenced to 150 hours of community service ...
by jeffalyanak on Friday April 01, 2022 @06:41AM
(#30876836)
Just like how speed limits necessitate the arrest of everyone who drives.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Twitter user sentenced to 150 hours of community service ...
by michaelscott on Friday April 01, 2022 @06:50AM
(#30876884)
...over the speed limit, yes. The point of parent's post is that the offensive nature of a statement or speech in general is subjective and can change with whims and the time. A speed limit is objective and quantifiable; if you go over the speed limit stated you get fined, there's no room for interpretation
Re:Twitter user sentenced to 150 hours of community service ...
by Pyramus on Friday April 01, 2022 @07:48AM
(#30877211)
Speed limits are not objective at all - Germany infamously does not have speed limits on highways.
And yes, speed limit laws, do change over time.
And no, you can't be punished for having broken a speed limit in the past, that is not in effect today.
Parent's comparison seems rather apt.
Re:Twitter user sentenced to 150 hours of community service ...
by hervature on Friday April 01, 2022 @03:08PM
(#30882099)
They obviously meant speed is quantifiable. You can measure speed and say "you violated the limit".
Re:Twitter user sentenced to 150 hours of community service ...
by Pyramus on Friday April 01, 2022 @04:09PM
(#30882759)
Yes, but it doesn't strengthen the argument.
If society A says the speed limit is X and society B it's Y and society C it's infinite. What's the point that speed is objectively measurable?
Re:Twitter user sentenced to 150 hours of community service ...
by hervature on Friday April 01, 2022 @05:28PM
(#30883496)
That making a rule even makes sense. It is not an argument as to what amount is sensible, just that "amount" is sensible.
Re:Twitter user sentenced to 150 hours of community service ...
by refurb on Saturday April 02, 2022 @06:05AM
(#30887062)
You’re missing the point.
Society A and society B won’t disagree on whether something is moving at 150km/hr.
Re:Twitter user sentenced to 150 hours of community service ...
by endominus on Saturday April 02, 2022 @03:11PM
(#30890858)
Well, they might if a physicist gets involved and starts complaining that no one has defined their point of reference.
Re:Twitter user sentenced to 150 hours of community service ...
by tored on Friday April 01, 2022 @06:53AM
(#30876905)
Your comparison would be true if the speed limit differentiated on the intent on the speeder, e.g. person A can drive over the speed limit but not person B because person B has the wrong intent.
Re:Twitter user sentenced to 150 hours of community service ...
by iso1631 on Friday April 01, 2022 @07:10AM
(#30877011)
In the UK it does. If you are speeding because you are an appropriately trained person performing emergency response duties then it's not illegal.
Re:Twitter user sentenced to 150 hours of community service ...
by tored on Friday April 01, 2022 @07:14AM
(#30877039)
It is not comparable, see this comment
Re:Twitter user sentenced to 150 hours of community service ...
by linschn on Friday April 01, 2022 @07:06AM
(#30876988)
Ambulance, firefighters, etc.
Re:Twitter user sentenced to 150 hours of community service ...
by tored on Friday April 01, 2022 @07:12AM
(#30877026)
They can do that because of regulation, not intent.
It is more like this, person A is in a hurry and is allowed to drive over the speed limit because person A is good person, but person B, who also is in a hurry, is a scumbag and therefore person B is not allowed to drive over the speed limit. It is very similar to how woke culture works.