Re:Twitter user sentenced to 150 hours of community service ...
by michaelscott on Friday April 01, 2022 @06:50AM
(#30876884)
...over the speed limit, yes. The point of parent's post is that the offensive nature of a statement or speech in general is subjective and can change with whims and the time. A speed limit is objective and quantifiable; if you go over the speed limit stated you get fined, there's no room for interpretation
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Twitter user sentenced to 150 hours of community service ...
by Pyramus on Friday April 01, 2022 @07:48AM
(#30877211)
Speed limits are not objective at all - Germany infamously does not have speed limits on highways.
And yes, speed limit laws, do change over time.
And no, you can't be punished for having broken a speed limit in the past, that is not in effect today.
Parent's comparison seems rather apt.
Re:Twitter user sentenced to 150 hours of community service ...
by hervature on Friday April 01, 2022 @03:08PM
(#30882099)
They obviously meant speed is quantifiable. You can measure speed and say "you violated the limit".
Re:Twitter user sentenced to 150 hours of community service ...
by Pyramus on Friday April 01, 2022 @04:09PM
(#30882759)
Yes, but it doesn't strengthen the argument.
If society A says the speed limit is X and society B it's Y and society C it's infinite. What's the point that speed is objectively measurable?
Re:Twitter user sentenced to 150 hours of community service ...
by hervature on Friday April 01, 2022 @05:28PM
(#30883496)
That making a rule even makes sense. It is not an argument as to what amount is sensible, just that "amount" is sensible.