News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Countering threats from North Korea by TedDoesntTalk on Sunday March 27, 2022 @06:54PM (#30824980)
Don’t reply to those SMS. Your geolocation can be derived from your reply, even a STOP or UNSUBSCRIBE reply.
Re:Countering threats from North Korea by akouri on Sunday March 27, 2022 @08:49PM (#30825757)
Can you explain how this works if you don't click any links?
Re:Countering threats from North Korea by TedDoesntTalk on Sunday March 27, 2022 @09:43PM (#30826135)
I read about it on HN some months ago. I don’t recall if it was in comments or an article. But I read the info and sources and was convinced enough at the time. I’m sorry I didn’t save the original info. I’ll try some googling “geolocation from SMS” and see what I can find.
Re:Countering threats from North Korea by TedDoesntTalk on Sunday March 27, 2022 @10:21PM (#30826394)
Here’s the best I could find:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18523417/can-i-retrieve-...

(Twilio is awesome by the way)

Re:Countering threats from North Korea by mathrawka on Monday March 28, 2022 @02:57AM (#30827863)
That information is completely derived from the phone number.
Re:Countering threats from North Korea by daenz on Sunday March 27, 2022 @09:55PM (#30826220)
Presumably if they have the number to text to, they already roughly know the geolocation for most people, through the area code.
Re:Countering threats from North Korea by TedDoesntTalk on Sunday March 27, 2022 @10:06PM (#30826293)
That’s not what I’m talking about. And since number portability and mobile devices became possible, area codes are mostly irrelevant. For example, I’ve lived 2000 miles from the area code of my phone number for probably 10 years now.
Re:Countering threats from North Korea by daenz on Sunday March 27, 2022 @10:23PM (#30826408)
They're not mostly irrelevant. 72% of Americans live in or close to the city that they grew up in. Area code is remarkably accurate.
Re:Countering threats from North Korea by jhugo on Sunday March 27, 2022 @10:06PM (#30826289)
Only in the US (or whole NANP?)

Mobile numbers are non-geographic everywhere else that I know of.

Re:Countering threats from North Korea by eru on Monday March 28, 2022 @04:50AM (#30828569)
Well, depends. For example, Singapore's numbers are 'non-geographic' in that sense. But Singapore itself is small enough.
Re:Countering threats from North Korea by elkos on Monday March 28, 2022 @06:23AM (#30829032)
Greek here, mobile phones are non-geographic but used to be service provider specific, but even this practice isn't applicable due to number portability.

Landlines used to be geographic but this isn't relevant any more again new to number portability.

Re:Countering threats from North Korea by jhugo on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @03:33AM (#30839836)
I mean non-geographic within the country. As far as I know, the US practice of assigning mobile numbers to 'area codes' is unique.
Re:Countering threats from North Korea by eru on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @07:57AM (#30841390)
Yes. I was broadly agreeing with you.

Just saying that some countries are small enough that it's essentially the same.

Re:Countering threats from North Korea by nl on Sunday March 27, 2022 @09:54PM (#30826210)
Can you provide a pointer showing how this is supposed to work?
Re:Countering threats from North Korea by iJohnDoe on Sunday March 27, 2022 @08:57PM (#30825830)
Yes, would like to learn more as well.
Re:Countering threats from North Korea by TedDoesntTalk on Sunday March 27, 2022 @09:44PM (#30826138)
I read about it on HN some months ago. I don’t recall if it was in comments or an article. But I read the info and sources and was convinced enough at the time. I’m sorry I didn’t save the original info. I’ll try some googling “geolocation from SMS” and see what I can find.
Re:Countering threats from North Korea by TedDoesntTalk on Sunday March 27, 2022 @10:21PM (#30826390)
Here’s the best I could find:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18523417/can-i-retrieve-...

(Twilio is awesome by the way)