News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by msandford on Saturday March 26, 2022 @06:42AM (#30810714)
20k deaths for a population of 10M in Sweden is 0.2% right? USA has had just under 1M deaths for 330M people or closer to 0.3%.

I'm not saying that Sweden did the totally right 100% perfect thing. But it seems to have done much less catastrophically horrible than many predicted at least as far as I can see.

Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by melling on Saturday March 26, 2022 @07:42AM (#30811009)
I like what you’re doing here. Take a country like the United States with a horrible outcome and use them for comparison. More people died after vaccines than before in the United States. How does that happen?

One thing is absolutely clear: 1 million Americans never needed to die from coronavirus.

Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by pmorici on Saturday March 26, 2022 @08:02AM (#30811108)
It's not clear to me the total deaths number is accurate in the US because the government was reimbursing hospitals for COVID treatment and paying for people's funerals who "died of covid". It incentivized people to list the cause of death as COVID even when covid didn't play a role in the death or was at best incidental to it.

Anecdotally this happened with the father of a friend of mine. He had cancer since before the pandemic and it became terminal after exhausting treatment options last year. As his condition deteriorated, they planned to move him to hospice, did a routine covid test and found he was positive. He died a few days later. He was going to die of cancer in days no matter what. He is counted among the million US covid deaths and the US government paid for a portion of the cost of the funeral.

What percentage of that million are cases like this? I don't know, but it is pretty clear it wasn't uncommon and in the context of your original comment I wouldn't call cases like this preventable deaths.

Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by jmull on Saturday March 26, 2022 @08:13AM (#30811186)
Look up excess deaths
Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by pmorici on Saturday March 26, 2022 @05:04PM (#30815361)
Excess deaths could just have easily been caused by people postponing medical care for other conditions. Hospitals were canceling elective procedures for example.
Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by refurb on Saturday March 26, 2022 @08:29AM (#30811288)
You act like excess deaths is an easy analysis, but deaths vary significantly year or year. What you baseline are makes a big difference.

And considering we’re not even through the epidemic it seems like it’s a bit early to call winners and losers.

Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by jmull on Saturday March 26, 2022 @09:03AM (#30811470)
Nonsense. There are various reasonable ways to calculate a baseline and they all show large surges over the covid period (which correspond to reported covid deaths, btw).

Also, there are no winners, what are you even talking about?

Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by refurb on Saturday March 26, 2022 @11:32AM (#30812719)
Do you average deaths over the past 5 years? Or 10 years? How do you correct for population growth? How about age distribution? What if you had a flu pandemic and deaths were 5% higher 3 years? Correct for that or not?
Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by shlant on Saturday March 26, 2022 @11:24AM (#30812629)
> the government was reimbursing hospitals for COVID treatment

That's how all of medicare works.

I can't believe people have been regurgitating this talking point since the beginning of the pandemic with no thought whatsoever about what it means

Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by pmorici on Saturday March 26, 2022 @05:02PM (#30815340)
They specifically boosted what Medicare paid for COVID treatment by 20% during the public health emergency.
Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by nradov on Saturday March 26, 2022 @08:51PM (#30816719)
This article has a good overview of the exact terms of the extra 20% payments made by Medicare.

https://www.hfma.org/topics/news/2020/04/increased-medicare-...

Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by shlant on Sunday March 27, 2022 @02:59AM (#30818335)
and? do you have any proof of your claim that "It incentivized people to list the cause of death as COVID even when covid didn't play a role in the death or was at best incidental to it"? Are you saying doctors are personally getting some sort of kickback?
Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by pmorici on Monday March 28, 2022 @08:31AM (#30829792)
Besides my direct experience? It doesn’t require fraud this is the result of the loose requirements to get reimbursed under these temporary measures and the fact that COVID tests are a routine part of hospital admissions. For example to be reimbursed for funeral costs COVID only need be listed as a contributing cause and doesn’t need to be the primary cause of death.
Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by shlant on Monday March 28, 2022 @08:46AM (#30829935)
so you have no evidence.

How much influence do you think what you are mentioning has had on the numbers and what is your proof of that?

Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by ianbooker on Saturday March 26, 2022 @06:58AM (#30810783)
It would be a better benchmark to compare Sweden with Denmark, since societies and health care capabilities are more alike.
Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by timr on Saturday March 26, 2022 @07:44AM (#30811018)
"Better" in the sense that it makes them look worse, and some people prefer this version of events? Perhaps.

But if you compare across all of Europe by deaths per capita, they're near the best performers on the list (#13; #12 in continental Europe), and the only reason those specific countries look better is because they're the top three in continental Europe (they're also smaller countries; see below):

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1111779/coronavirus-deat...

In particular, the UK, France, Spain, Belgium, Italy and Portugal all did worse, despite far more significant impositions on society.

It's also important to know that worldwide, there's a clear dependence of per-capita deaths on population (greater population -> greater deaths per capita):

https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality (second plot; deaths per 100k population tab)

And that Denmark has a population of ~5.8M, Norway 5.4M, and Sweden 10.4M. This alone should make you question any simple narrative involving interventions and outcome.

Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by ZeroGravitas on Saturday March 26, 2022 @07:06AM (#30810828)
Since I looked it up out of curiousity:

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1104709/coronavirus-deat...

deaths per million inhabitants:

Sweden: 1,755.2

Denmark: 924.97

Finland: 521.89

Norway: 405.58

Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by sampo on Saturday March 26, 2022 @07:50AM (#30811056)
There's a recent large study in The Lancet, where they estimate 2020-2021 excess mortality, and compare these to reported Covid19 deaths. The study covers a large number of countries, but here I only look at your four.

              excess  excess/reported   excess/(1 million)
    Denmark:  10 400             308%                 1784
    Finland:    8780             503%                 1587
    Norway:      742              57%                  138
    Sweden:   18 100             118%                 1719
Either the study methodology to estimate excess mortality has some problems with Denmark and Finland. Or, if the study is correct, the official numbers from Finland and Denmark are bad in estimating their own Covid19 deaths: Denmark underestimating by 3x, Finland underestimating by 5x.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6...

Direct link to results table:

https://www.thelancet.com/action/showFullTableHTML?isHtml=tr...

Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by Lewton on Saturday March 26, 2022 @08:16AM (#30811205)
Denmark tested way more than any other country in the world. They most likely have the most accurate picture of how many people actually died with covid

I'd strongly question their method of calculating excess mortality, look at denmark on https://www.euromomo.eu/graphs-and-maps and compare it to other countries

Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by jltsiren on Saturday March 26, 2022 @09:14AM (#30811537)
I would assume methodological flaws. Just by looking at the number of authors and the publication date, the authors simply did not have enough time to control for area-specific factors for 191 countries and 252 subnational units.

Finland reported 53949 deaths from all causes in 2019, 55488 deaths in 2020, and 57343 deaths in 2021. (The figure for 2021 is preliminary.) The total increase from the 2019 level in 2020-2021 is ~5000 deaths, and a large part of that is explained by aging population.

Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by specialist on Saturday March 26, 2022 @09:20AM (#30811567)
Agree on using excess deaths data.

Also, it'll be years before knockoff effects can be more fully assessed.

Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by throwaway4good on Saturday March 26, 2022 @07:25AM (#30810917)
Maybe add Netherlands and Germany ...

And in DK we are now doing 20-50 corona dead pr. day - leaving us at 365*20-50 / 5.5 at 1,327 - 3.318 added for this year.

Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by alkonaut on Saturday March 26, 2022 @10:34AM (#30812164)
Societies and health care aren’t as similar as one might think in the Nordics. Sweden is surprisingly diverse, unequal, urbanized etc. It’s more “continental” than its neighbors in a lot of ways.
Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by lament76 on Saturday March 26, 2022 @07:55AM (#30811079)
The US has like 5 times the obesity rate and obesity is a relatively strong predictor of adverse outcomes with C19.