News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by melling on Saturday March 26, 2022 @07:42AM (#30811009)
I like what you’re doing here. Take a country like the United States with a horrible outcome and use them for comparison. More people died after vaccines than before in the United States. How does that happen?

One thing is absolutely clear: 1 million Americans never needed to die from coronavirus.

Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by pmorici on Saturday March 26, 2022 @08:02AM (#30811108)
It's not clear to me the total deaths number is accurate in the US because the government was reimbursing hospitals for COVID treatment and paying for people's funerals who "died of covid". It incentivized people to list the cause of death as COVID even when covid didn't play a role in the death or was at best incidental to it.

Anecdotally this happened with the father of a friend of mine. He had cancer since before the pandemic and it became terminal after exhausting treatment options last year. As his condition deteriorated, they planned to move him to hospice, did a routine covid test and found he was positive. He died a few days later. He was going to die of cancer in days no matter what. He is counted among the million US covid deaths and the US government paid for a portion of the cost of the funeral.

What percentage of that million are cases like this? I don't know, but it is pretty clear it wasn't uncommon and in the context of your original comment I wouldn't call cases like this preventable deaths.

Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by jmull on Saturday March 26, 2022 @08:13AM (#30811186)
Look up excess deaths
Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by pmorici on Saturday March 26, 2022 @05:04PM (#30815361)
Excess deaths could just have easily been caused by people postponing medical care for other conditions. Hospitals were canceling elective procedures for example.
Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by refurb on Saturday March 26, 2022 @08:29AM (#30811288)
You act like excess deaths is an easy analysis, but deaths vary significantly year or year. What you baseline are makes a big difference.

And considering we’re not even through the epidemic it seems like it’s a bit early to call winners and losers.

Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by jmull on Saturday March 26, 2022 @09:03AM (#30811470)
Nonsense. There are various reasonable ways to calculate a baseline and they all show large surges over the covid period (which correspond to reported covid deaths, btw).

Also, there are no winners, what are you even talking about?

Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by refurb on Saturday March 26, 2022 @11:32AM (#30812719)
Do you average deaths over the past 5 years? Or 10 years? How do you correct for population growth? How about age distribution? What if you had a flu pandemic and deaths were 5% higher 3 years? Correct for that or not?
Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by shlant on Saturday March 26, 2022 @11:24AM (#30812629)
> the government was reimbursing hospitals for COVID treatment

That's how all of medicare works.

I can't believe people have been regurgitating this talking point since the beginning of the pandemic with no thought whatsoever about what it means

Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by pmorici on Saturday March 26, 2022 @05:02PM (#30815340)
They specifically boosted what Medicare paid for COVID treatment by 20% during the public health emergency.
Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by nradov on Saturday March 26, 2022 @08:51PM (#30816719)
This article has a good overview of the exact terms of the extra 20% payments made by Medicare.

https://www.hfma.org/topics/news/2020/04/increased-medicare-...

Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by shlant on Sunday March 27, 2022 @02:59AM (#30818335)
and? do you have any proof of your claim that "It incentivized people to list the cause of death as COVID even when covid didn't play a role in the death or was at best incidental to it"? Are you saying doctors are personally getting some sort of kickback?
Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by pmorici on Monday March 28, 2022 @08:31AM (#30829792)
Besides my direct experience? It doesn’t require fraud this is the result of the loose requirements to get reimbursed under these temporary measures and the fact that COVID tests are a routine part of hospital admissions. For example to be reimbursed for funeral costs COVID only need be listed as a contributing cause and doesn’t need to be the primary cause of death.
Re:Evaluation of science advice during the Covid-19 pandemic... by shlant on Monday March 28, 2022 @08:46AM (#30829935)
so you have no evidence.

How much influence do you think what you are mentioning has had on the numbers and what is your proof of that?