Telegrams are insufficiently complex to express ideas on the nature of existence, and even if they were not, a frontier philosopher would run short of either money or time long before he reached his second axiom. You cannot use telegrams to do philosophy. Its form excludes the content.
Tell that to Wittgenstein. Tractatus would have been a twitter thread nowadays.
Literally smoke signals implemented in rocks so dumb we tricked them into thinking.
..-. .- .. .-.. ..- .-. . / - --- / --. .-. .- ... .--. / - .... .. ... / .-- .. .-.. .-.. / --. . - / -.-- --- ..- / -.. .- -... -... . -.. / --- -. / -... -.-- / . ...- . .-. -.-- / -- --- .-. ... . / ..- ... . .-. / . ...- . .-. --..-- / .- -. -.. / .- .-. --. ..- .- -... .-.. -.-- --..-- / . ...- . .-. -.-- / -.-. --- -- .--. ..- - . .-. / ... -.-. .. . -. - .. ... - / .-- .. - .... / . ...- . -. / .- -. / .. --- - .- / --- ..-. / .--. .... .. .-.. --- ... --- .--. .... .. -.-. .- .-.. / ..- -. -.. . .-. .--. .. -. -. .. -. --. .-.-.- / --- ..-. / .-- .... .. -.-. .... / .. / .- -- / .- - / .-.. . .- ... - / .- / -.. .- -... -... .-.. . .-. / --- ..-. / - .... . / ..-. --- .-. -- . .-. --..-- / .- -. -.. / .- / -- . -- -... . .-. / --- ..-. / - .... . / .-.. .- - - . .-. .-.-.-
It doesn't take that many leaves to make smoke.
Nice Rorschach there with your quip about racism, however. You may want to think about that a bit.
In Mexico, we don't have clean water in our faucets. Electricity and the internet shuts off, randomly due to infrastructure problems or maintenance. And yet, we are humorous. We make fun of each other. And yes, this includes racial and cultural differences which we laugh at, in poking fun at each other, together. In England they might call it "taking the piss out of you". In Mexico, it's normal.
And yet in the US, there's not these "third world problems",
So the aspect of "simultaneously hilarious and unnecessary" I mention is regarding how people in the US, since they don't have "third world problems", they make their own problems to create drama about... I suppose so that they can feel some sort of relevance of a struggle.
In doing so, they reduce the capacity of dialogue, and they ruin and potential existence of Humor in a conversation -- because people are expected to walk on egg shells on certain topics.
It really destroys the fun in conversations when you have to worry about "oh my goodness, I am risking talking about something that's not politically correct! Someone who isn't actually related to the conversation content might pretend to be offended for the sake of some other non-existing-in-the-conversation person to show off their virtuous nature".
Socrates didn't really write stuff down...